Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22669754›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2012

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies: how are they detected and what is their use for diagnosis, classification and follow-up?

Jan Willem Cohen Tervaert, Jan Damoiseaux

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Immunopathogenesis of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Evaluation of PR3-ANCA Status After Rituximab for ANCA-Associated Vasculitis.Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan Willem Cohen TervaertDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Clinical and Experimental Immunology and Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. jw.cohentervaert@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Jan Damoiseaux
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) are traditionally detected by an indirect immunofluorescence technique. According to the international consensus on ANCA testing, ANCA should also be tested by antigen-specific tests for myeloperoxidase-ANCA and proteinase 3-ANCA. The direct noncompetitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) used to be the method of choice. Nowadays, these assays are called "first-generation" assays. Second-generation tests (capture ELISA) or third-generation tests (anchor ELISA) are more sensitive and specific for ANCA testing. We postulate that ANCA as detected by these newer ANCA tests may replace the need to perform indirect immunofluorescence-based assays. For classification of patients, ANCA serotype seems more important than classifying patients according to their clinical subtype, since genetics, clinical manifestations and response to therapy are more related to ANCA serotype than to clinical subtype. Detection of ANCA to monitor disease activity is still a controversial issue. Treatment based on ANCA levels is at present only experimentally performed in those patients who are treated with B-cell depletion therapy with rituximab. Future studies are needed to establish whether this way of monitoring patients is warranted.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, Antineutrophil CytoplasmicEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansMyeloblastinPeroxidaseAntibodies, Antineutrophil CytoplasmicMyeloblastinPeroxidase

Identifiers

PMID22669754
OpenAlexW2020834363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.