Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22669615›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2012

A genomic bias for genotype-environment interactions in C. elegans.

Vladislav Grishkevich, Shay Ben-Elazar, Tamar Hashimshony, Daniel H Schott, Craig P Hunter, Itai Yanai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Marine life science & technology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ThemBio · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. WormQTL2: an interactive platform for systems genetics in Caenorhabditis elegans.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vladislav GrishkevichDepartment of Biology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Shay Ben-Elazar
Tamar Hashimshony
Daniel H Schott
Craig P Hunter
Itai Yanai

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenotype of an organism is determined by its genotype and environment. An interaction between these two arises from the differential effect of the environment on gene expression in distinct genotypes; however, the genomic properties identifying these are not well understood. Here we analyze the transcriptomes of five C. elegans strains (genotype) cultivated in five growth conditions (environment), and find that highly regulated genes, as distinguished by intergenic lengths, motif concentration, and expression levels, are particularly biased toward genotype-environment interactions. Sequencing these strains, we find that genes with expression variation across genotypes are enriched for promoter single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), as expected. However, genes with genotype-environment interactions do not significantly differ from background in terms of their promoter SNPs. Collectively, these results indicate that the highly regulated nature of particular genes predispose them for exhibiting genotype-environment interaction as a consequence of changes to upstream regulators. This observation may provide a deeper understanding into the origin of the extraordinary gene expression diversity present in even closely related species.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionPromoter Regions, GeneticAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansGene Expression RegulationGenomicsGenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID22669615
PMCPMC3397417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.