Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22669421›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2013

Preoperative clinical, demographic, and urodynamic measures associated with failure to demonstrate urodynamic stress incontinence in women enrolled in two randomized clinical trials of surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Gary E Lemack, Heather J Litman, Charles Nager, Linda Brubaker, Jerry Lowder, Peggy Norton, Larry Sirls, Keith Lloyd, John W Kusek, Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Gary E LemackUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. gary.lemack@utsouthwestern.edu
Heather J Litman
Charles Nager
Linda Brubaker
Jerry Lowder
Peggy Norton
Larry Sirls
Keith Lloyd
John W Kusek
Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network
Southwestern Medical Center · USLoyola University Chicago · USLoyola University Medical Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network: DCCU01DK058229 · NIDDK · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI TENNSTEDT, SHARON L · 2000 to 2012
$16.1M
UAB Continence Treatment Center U01DK060380 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RICHTER, HOLLY E · 2001 to 2009
$3.9M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058225 · NIDDK · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ZYCZYNSKI, HALINA M · 2000 to 2009
$3.8M
UCSD INCONTINENCE TREATMENT CENTERU01DK060401 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ALBO, MICHAEL · 2001 to 2010
$3.6M
Continuation of the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)U01DK060379 · NIDDK · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA · 2001 to 2009
$3.6M
UTAH URINARY INCONTINENCE TREATMENT NETWORK (UUITN)U01DK060393 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NORTON, PEGGY A · 2001 to 2009
$3.4M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK060395 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZIMMERN, PHILIPPE E · 2001 to 2009
$2.4M
The Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058234 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI KRAUS, STEPHEN R · 2000 to 2009
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058225NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058229NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058234NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060379NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060380NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060393NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060395NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe unexpected absence of urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) in women planning surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a challenge to surgeons. We examined the prevalence and clinical and demographic factors associated at baseline (preoperatively) with the unexpected absence of USI among study participants of two multicenter randomized clinical trials of surgery for treating SUI.

methodsWomen with SUI symptoms and positive stress tests on physical examination enrolled in two separate clinical trials-one comparing the autologous fascial sling with the Burch colposuspension [Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy Trial (SISTEr), and the other comparing the retropubic mid-urethral sling with the transobturator midurethral sling [Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings (TOMUS)]-were evaluated for USI preoperatively. The association of clinical, demographic, and urodynamic parameters was examined in women without USI in univariate and multivariate analyses.

resultsOverall, 144 of 1,233 women (11.7 %) enrolled in the two studies showed no USI. These women had a significantly lower mean volume at maximum cystometric capacity than those with USI (347.5 vs. 395.8 in SISTEr, p = 0.012), (315.2 vs. 358.2 in TOMUS, p = 0.003) and a lower mean number of daily accidents reported on a 3-day diary (2.2 vs 2.7 in SISTEr, p = 0.030) (1.7 vs 2.7 in TOMUS, p < 0.001). Additionally, those without demonstrable USI were more likely to have Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage III/IV (31.7 % vs 14.4 % in SISTEr, p = 0.002), (15.5 % vs 6.9 % in TOMUS, p = 0.025). SUI severity as recorded on the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) correlated strongly with the presence of USI in both studies.

conclusionsWe observed that about one of eight women planning surgery for SUI does not show USI. Stage 3/4 POP was strongly associated with the unexpected absence of USI. A diminished urodynamic bladder capacity among women who did not display USI may reflect an inability to reach the limits of capacity during urodynamics, at which these women normally leak.

Indexed as

Preoperative PeriodAdultDemographyDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapseSuburethral SlingsUrinary Incontinence, StressUrodynamics

Identifiers

PMID22669421
PMCPMC4169424
OpenAlexW2062611554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.