Trial reportJapanese journal of ophthalmology2012
Comparison of efficacy of four prostaglandin analogues by bilateral treatment in healthy subjects.
Trial report in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the Effect of Latanoprostene Bunod Ophthalmic Solution, 0.024% in Lowering Intraocular Pressure over 24 h in Healthy Japanese Subjects.Advances in therapy · 2015Trial
- Influence of PTGS1, PTGFR, and MRP4 genetic variants on intraocular pressure response to latanoprost in Chinese primary open-angle glaucoma patients.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Trial
- From Eye Care to Hair Growth: Bimatoprost.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effect of systemic antihypertensives on change in intraocular pressure after initiating topical prostaglandins for primary open-angle glaucoma.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Switching Latanoprost Monotherapy to Bimatoprost Monotherapy or Combination of Brinzolamide and Latanoprost.The open ophthalmology journal · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the drug efficacy of four prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) by bilateral treatment in normal subjects.
methodsThree consecutive studies comparing latanoprost to three other PGAs (travoprost, tafluprost and bimatoprost) were performed in 24 healthy subjects. Each study was separated by a washout period of over 6 weeks. In each study, two drugs were randomly assigned to one eye of each subject. Study subjects instilled the assigned medication at 9:00 p.m. every day for 2 weeks. The same masked investigator measured intraocular pressure (IOP) at 9:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. at baseline and repeated measurements on days 7 and 14. The differences in IOP reduction were compared between the drugs.
resultsMean diurnal IOP reduction with latanoprost on days 7 and 14 was similar to that with travoprost and tafluprost, but was significantly lower than that with bimatoprost. The association of the mean diurnal IOP reduction between latanoprost and bimatoprost on day 14 (r (2) = 0.25) was weak, in remarkable contrast to the strong association between latanoprost and travoprost (r (2) = 0.81) and between latanoprost and tafluprost (0.82).
conclusionsThe short-term bilateral treatment revealed a different IOP-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost compared to other PGAs in healthy subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.