Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22666601›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer2012

Markers of field cancerization: proposed clinical applications in prostate biopsies.

Kristina A Trujillo, Anna C Jones, Jeffrey K Griffith, Marco Bisoffi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Spatial Multiplexing and Omics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2024
    Article
  7. A computational model for the cancer field effect.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023
    Article
  8. Field cancerization in breast cancer.The Journal of pathology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Traps and trumps from adjacent-to-tumor samples in gastric cancer research.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2018
    Article
  14. Role ofOncoTargets and therapy · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Promoter hypermethylation ofInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristina A TrujilloDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Anna C Jones
Jeffrey K Griffith
Marco Bisoffi
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

UNM HSC Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001449 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CAMPEN, MATTHEW J, PANDHI, NANCY · 2015 to 2024
$36.9M
University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000041 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI LARSON, RICHARD S · 2012 to 2014
$9.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000041NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field cancerization denotes the occurrence of genetic, epigenetic, and biochemical aberrations in structurally intact cells in histologically normal tissues adjacent to cancerous lesions. This paper tabulates markers of prostate field cancerization known to date and discusses their potential clinical value in the analysis of prostate biopsies, including diagnosis, monitoring progression during active surveillance, and assessing efficacy of presurgical neoadjuvant and focal therapeutic interventions.

Identifiers

PMID22666601
PMCPMC3361299
OpenAlexW2008479759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.