Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22666323›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Genome-wide expression analysis identifies a modulator of ionizing radiation-induced p53-independent apoptosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Petra van Bergeijk, Joseph Heimiller, Lyle Uyetake, Tin Tin Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Regulation and coordination of the different DNA damage responses inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. What Drosophila Can Teach Us About Radiation Biology of Human Cancers.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Petra van BergeijkDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Joseph Heimiller
Lyle Uyetake
Tin Tin Su

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007135 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI KRAUTER, KENNETH S · 1985 to 2012
$5.7M
Regulation of Radiation Induced Cell Death in DrosophilaR01GM087276 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI SU, TIN TIN · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087276NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM87276NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007135NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor suppressor p53 plays a key role in DNA damage responses in metazoa, yet more than half of human tumors show p53 deficiencies. Therefore, understanding how therapeutic genotoxins such as ionizing radiation (IR) can elicit DNA damage responses in a p53-independent manner is of clinical importance. Drosophila has been a good model to study the effects of IR because DNA damage responses as well as underlying genes are conserved in this model, and because streamlined gene families make loss-of-function analyses feasible. Indeed, Drosophila is the only genetically tractable model for IR-induced, p53-independent apoptosis and for tissue regeneration and homeostasis after radiation damage. While these phenomenon occur only in the larvae, all genome-wide gene expression analyses after irradiation to date have been in embryos. We report here the first analysis of IR-induced, genome-wide gene expression changes in wild type and p53 mutant Drosophila larvae. Key data from microarrays were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR. The results solidify the central role of p53 in IR-induced transcriptome changes, but also show that nearly all changes are made of both p53-dependent and p53-independent components. p53 is found to be necessary not just for the induction of but also for the repression of transcript levels for many genes in response to IR. Furthermore, Functional analysis of one of the top-changing genes, EF1a-100E, implicates it in repression of IR-induced p53-independent apoptosis. These and other results support the emerging notion that there is not a single dominant mechanism but that both positive and negative inputs collaborate to induce p53-independent apoptosis in response to IR in Drosophila larvae.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAnimalsApoptosisDNA DamageDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGenome, InsectHumansLarvaMutationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRNA, MessengerTumor Suppressor Protein p53Drosophila ProteinsRNA, MessengerTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID22666323
PMCPMC3362589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.