ArticlePloS one2012
Genome-wide expression analysis identifies a modulator of ionizing radiation-induced p53-independent apoptosis in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Protein Stability with Small Molecules: A Review of the ecDHFR Destabilizing Domain System.ACS chemical biology · 2026Review
- Beyond the mouse: 3R-guided alternative animal models transforming cancer research.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Single-cell transcriptomics of X-ray irradiatedeLife · 2026Article
- A function of Spalt proteins in heterochromatin organization and maintenance of genomic DNA integrity.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- The tardigrade Hypsibius exemplaris dramatically upregulates DNA repair pathway genes in response to ionizing radiation.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Article
- Microplastic induces mitochondrial pathway mediated cellular apoptosis in mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) via inhibition of the AKT and ERK signaling pathway.Cell death discovery · 2023Article
- Checkpoint activation drives global gene expression changes in Drosophila nuclear lamina mutants.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Differential gene expression analysis identified determinants of cell fate plasticity during radiation-induced regeneration in Drosophila.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Regulation and coordination of the different DNA damage responses inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Eiger/TNFα-mediated Dilp8 and ROS production coordinate intra-organ growth in Drosophila.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- What Drosophila Can Teach Us About Radiation Biology of Human Cancers.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019Review
- The transcription factor Grainy head primes epithelial enhancers for spatiotemporal activation by displacing nucleosomes.Nature genetics · 2018Article
- Chronic activation of JNK JAK/STAT and oxidative stress signalling causes the loser cell status.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Article
- Drosophila Wnt and STAT Define Apoptosis-Resistant Epithelial Cells for Tissue Regeneration after Irradiation.PLoS biology · 2016Article
- Roles for the Histone Modifying and Exchange Complex NuA4 in Cell Cycle Progression in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2016Article
- Molecular Effects of Irradiation (Cobalt-60) on the Control of Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae).International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Article
- Tie-mediated signal from apoptotic cells protects stem cells in Drosophila melanogaster.Nature communications · 2015Article
- Low levels of p53 protein and chromatin silencing of p53 target genes repress apoptosis in Drosophila endocycling cells.PLoS genetics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor suppressor p53 plays a key role in DNA damage responses in metazoa, yet more than half of human tumors show p53 deficiencies. Therefore, understanding how therapeutic genotoxins such as ionizing radiation (IR) can elicit DNA damage responses in a p53-independent manner is of clinical importance. Drosophila has been a good model to study the effects of IR because DNA damage responses as well as underlying genes are conserved in this model, and because streamlined gene families make loss-of-function analyses feasible. Indeed, Drosophila is the only genetically tractable model for IR-induced, p53-independent apoptosis and for tissue regeneration and homeostasis after radiation damage. While these phenomenon occur only in the larvae, all genome-wide gene expression analyses after irradiation to date have been in embryos. We report here the first analysis of IR-induced, genome-wide gene expression changes in wild type and p53 mutant Drosophila larvae. Key data from microarrays were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR. The results solidify the central role of p53 in IR-induced transcriptome changes, but also show that nearly all changes are made of both p53-dependent and p53-independent components. p53 is found to be necessary not just for the induction of but also for the repression of transcript levels for many genes in response to IR. Furthermore, Functional analysis of one of the top-changing genes, EF1a-100E, implicates it in repression of IR-induced p53-independent apoptosis. These and other results support the emerging notion that there is not a single dominant mechanism but that both positive and negative inputs collaborate to induce p53-independent apoptosis in response to IR in Drosophila larvae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.