ArticlePloS one2012
Identification of functional differences in metabolic networks using comparative genomics and constraint-based models.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Single Organisms to Communities: Modeling Methanotrophs and Their Satellites.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Community-scale models of microbiomes: Articulating metabolic modelling and metagenome sequencing.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Review
- A Multi-Level Systems Biology Analysis of Aldrin's Metabolic Effects on Prostate Cancer Cells.Proteomes · 2023Article
- Music of metagenomics-a review of its applications, analysis pipeline, and associated tools.Functional & integrative genomics · 2022Review
- Biochemical Characteristics and a Genome-Scale Metabolic Model of an Indian Euryhaline Cyanobacterium with High Polyglucan Content.Metabolites · 2020Article
- New Applications of Synthetic Biology Tools for Cyanobacterial Metabolic Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Integrating proteomic or transcriptomic data into metabolic models using linear bound flux balance analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Advances in metabolic modeling of oleaginous microalgae.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2018Review
- Model-driven discovery of long-chain fatty acid metabolic reprogramming in heterogeneous prostate cancer cells.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Community metabolic modeling approaches to understanding the gut microbiome: Bridging biochemistry and ecology.Free radical biology & medicine · 2017Review
- Toward Multiscale Models of Cyanobacterial Growth: A Modular Approach.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2016Review
- Integrated in silico Analyses of Regulatory and Metabolic Networks of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 Reveal Relationships between Gene Centrality and Essentiality.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Article
- Expanding Metabolic Engineering Algorithms Using Feasible Space and Shadow Price Constraint Modules.Metabolic engineering communications · 2014Article
- Generation and Evaluation of a Genome-Scale Metabolic Network Model of Synechococcus elongatus PCC7942.Metabolites · 2014Article
- Comparisons of Shewanella strains based on genome annotations, modeling, and experiments.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- Genome-scale reconstruction of metabolic networks of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 and 12A.PloS one · 2014Article
- Rapid construction of metabolic models for a family of Cyanobacteria using a multiple source annotation workflow.BMC systems biology · 2013Article
- Quantitative assessment of thermodynamic constraints on the solution space of genome-scale metabolic models.Biophysical journal · 2013Article
- Flux balance analysis of cyanobacterial metabolism: the metabolic network of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- Synthetic biology of cyanobacteria: unique challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in microbiology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-scale network reconstructions are useful tools for understanding cellular metabolism, and comparisons of such reconstructions can provide insight into metabolic differences between organisms. Recent efforts toward comparing genome-scale models have focused primarily on aligning metabolic networks at the reaction level and then looking at differences and similarities in reaction and gene content. However, these reaction comparison approaches are time-consuming and do not identify the effect network differences have on the functional states of the network. We have developed a bilevel mixed-integer programming approach, CONGA, to identify functional differences between metabolic networks by comparing network reconstructions aligned at the gene level. We first identify orthologous genes across two reconstructions and then use CONGA to identify conditions under which differences in gene content give rise to differences in metabolic capabilities. By seeking genes whose deletion in one or both models disproportionately changes flux through a selected reaction (e.g., growth or by-product secretion) in one model over another, we are able to identify structural metabolic network differences enabling unique metabolic capabilities. Using CONGA, we explore functional differences between two metabolic reconstructions of Escherichia coli and identify a set of reactions responsible for chemical production differences between the two models. We also use this approach to aid in the development of a genome-scale model of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002. Finally, we propose potential antimicrobial targets in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Staphylococcus aureus based on differences in their metabolic capabilities. Through these examples, we demonstrate that a gene-centric approach to comparing metabolic networks allows for a rapid comparison of metabolic models at a functional level. Using CONGA, we can identify differences in reaction and gene content which give rise to different functional predictions. Because CONGA provides a general framework, it can be applied to find functional differences across models and biological systems beyond those presented here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.