Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22665932›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2012

Primary and secondary breast lymphoma: prevalence, clinical signs and radiological features.

A Surov, H-J Holzhausen, A Wienke, J Schmidt, C Thomssen, D Arnold, K Ruschke, R-P Spielmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Breast Lymphoma: Rare Mimicker of Breast Cancer.Indian dermatology online journal · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Imaging Findings of Thoracic Extranodal Lymphoma: A Pictorial Essay.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Lymphoma in the breast: a diagnostic and treatment dilemma.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Secondary breast lymphoma: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2024
    Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A SurovDepartment of Radiology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany. alex.surow@medizin.uni-halle.de
H-J Holzhausen
A Wienke
J Schmidt
C Thomssen
D Arnold
K Ruschke
R-P Spielmann
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence, clinical signs and radiological features of breast lymphoma.

methodsThis is a retrospective review of 36 patients with breast lymphoma (22 primary and 14 secondary). 35 patients were female and 1 was male; their median age was 65 years (range 24-88 years). In all patients, the diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically.

resultsThe prevalence of breast lymphoma was 1.6% of all identified cases with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 0.5% of cases with breast cancer. B-cell lymphoma was found in 94% and T-cell lymphoma in 6%. 96 lesions were identified (2.7 per patient). The mean size was 15.8 ± 8.3 mm. The number of intramammary lesions was higher in secondary than in primary lymphoma. The size of the identified intramammary lesions was larger in primary than in secondary lymphoma. Clinically, 86% of the patients presented with solitary or multiple breast lumps. In 14%, breast involvement was diagnosed incidentally during staging examinations.

conclusionOn mammography, intramammary masses were the most commonly seen (27 patients, 82%). Architectural distortion occurred in three patients (9%). In three patients (9%), no abnormalities were found on mammography. On ultrasound, the identified lesions were homogeneously hypoechoic or heterogeneously mixed hypo- to hyperechoic. On MRI, the morphology of the lesions was variable. After intravenous administration of contrast medium, a marked inhomogeneous contrast enhancement was seen in most cases. On CT, most lesions presented as circumscribed round or oval masses with moderate or high enhancement.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms, MaleFemaleHumansLymphoma, B-CellLymphoma, T-CellMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMammographyMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID22665932
PMCPMC3474114
OpenAlexW2033042548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.