Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22665781›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Accurate protein structure modeling using sparse NMR data and homologous structure information.

James M Thompson, Nikolaos G Sgourakis, Gaohua Liu, Paolo Rossi, Yuefeng Tang, Jeffrey L Mills, Thomas Szyperski, Gaetano T Montelione, David Baker

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recent Advances in NMR Protein Structure Prediction with ROSETTA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. CS-ROSETTA.Methods in enzymology · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Computational methods in drug discovery.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2016
    Review
  12. A community resource of experimental data for NMR / X-ray crystal structure pairs.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

James M ThompsonDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Nikolaos G Sgourakis
Gaohua Liu
Paolo Rossi
Yuefeng Tang
Jeffrey L Mills
Thomas Szyperski
Gaetano T Montelione
David Baker
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Washington · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

University of Georgia ProjectU54GM094597 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI DETITTA, GEORGE T · 2010 to 2014
$36.9M
High resolution structure modeling with RosettaR01GM092802 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAKER, DAVID · 2010 to 2017
$2.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS 1R01-GM092802-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092802NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094597NIGMS NIH HHS U54-GM094597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While information from homologous structures plays a central role in X-ray structure determination by molecular replacement, such information is rarely used in NMR structure determination because it can be incorrect, both locally and globally, when evolutionary relationships are inferred incorrectly or there has been considerable evolutionary structural divergence. Here we describe a method that allows robust modeling of protein structures of up to 225 residues by combining (1)H(N), (13)C, and (15)N backbone and (13)Cβ chemical shift data, distance restraints derived from homologous structures, and a physically realistic all-atom energy function. Accurate models are distinguished from inaccurate models generated using incorrect sequence alignments by requiring that (i) the all-atom energies of models generated using the restraints are lower than models generated in unrestrained calculations and (ii) the low-energy structures converge to within 2.0 Å backbone rmsd over 75% of the protein. Benchmark calculations on known structures and blind targets show that the method can accurately model protein structures, even with very remote homology information, to a backbone rmsd of 1.2-1.9 Å relative to the conventional determined NMR ensembles and of 0.9-1.6 Å relative to X-ray structures for well-defined regions of the protein structures. This approach facilitates the accurate modeling of protein structures using backbone chemical shift data without need for side-chain resonance assignments and extensive analysis of NOESY cross-peak assignments.

Indexed as

Crystallography, X-RayModels, MolecularNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID22665781
PMCPMC3382498
OpenAlexW2100780689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.