Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22665441›Full record

ArticleGenome research2012

Maintaining replication origins in the face of genomic change.

Sara C Di Rienzi, Kimberly C Lindstrom, Tobias Mann, William S Noble, M K Raghuraman, Bonita J Brewer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Analysis of ssDNA gaps and DSBs in genetically unstable yeast cultures.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. DNA replication timing.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara C Di RienziDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Kimberly C Lindstrom
Tobias Mann
William S Noble
M K Raghuraman
Bonita J Brewer

Funding

ZDS2P REGULATES SWE1P-DEPENDENT POLARIZED CELL GROWTH IN S CEREVISIAEP41RR011823 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FIELDS, STANLEY · 1996 to 2011
$24.7M
TrainingP41GM103533 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, TRISHA N. · 2012 to 2021
$20.7M
EUKARYOTIC CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE AND REPLICATIONR01GM018926 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BREWER, BONITA J · 1985 to 2016
$6.8M
EUKARYOTIC CHROMOSOME REPLICATIONR37GM018926 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FANGMAN, WALTON L · 1995 to 2004
$2.6M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN BIOMEDICAL SCIENCESF31GM018926 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MEDICINE, ROCHESTER · PI RODRIGUES, PAULA D · 1997 to 2001
$46k
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR0011823NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR011823NIGMS NIH HHS F31 GM018926NIGMS NIH HHS GM18926NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103533NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM018926NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM018926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Origins of replication present a paradox to evolutionary biologists. As a collection, they are absolutely essential genomic features, but individually are highly redundant and nonessential. It is therefore difficult to predict to what extent and in what regard origins are conserved over evolutionary time. Here, through a comparative genomic analysis of replication origins and chromosomal replication patterns in the budding yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lachancea waltii, we assess to what extent replication origins survived genomic change produced from 150 million years of evolution. We find that L. waltii origins exhibit a core consensus sequence and nucleosome occupancy pattern highly similar to those of S. cerevisiae origins. We further observe that the overall progression of chromosomal replication is similar between L. waltii and S. cerevisiae. Nevertheless, few origins show evidence of being conserved in location between the two species. Among the conserved origins are those surrounding centromeres and adjacent to histone genes, suggesting that proximity to an origin may be important for their regulation. We conclude that, over evolutionary time, origins maintain sequence, structure, and regulation, but are continually being created and destroyed, with the result that their locations are generally not conserved.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationGenome, FungalReplication OriginBase CompositionCentromereChromosomes, FungalConsensus SequenceGene AmplificationGene RearrangementMutationNucleosomesPlasmidsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTelomereTranscription, GeneticNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID22665441
PMCPMC3460189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.