Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22665309›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2012

Label-free protein quantitation using weighted spectral counting.

Christine Vogel, Edward M Marcotte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine VogelDepartment of Biology, Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Edward M Marcotte
New York University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Proteomics of widespread, reversible protein assemblies in aging and aggregationR01GM076536 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARCOTTE, EDWARD M · 2006 to 2014
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based shotgun proteomics allows protein identifications even in complex biological samples. Protein abundances can then be estimated from the counts of MS/MS spectra attributable to each protein, provided that one corrects for differential MS-detectability of the contributing peptides. We describe the use of a method, APEX, which calculates Absolute Protein EXpression levels based on learned correction factors, MS/MS spectral counts, and each protein's probability of correct identification.The APEX-based calculations consist of three parts: (1) Using training data, peptide sequences and their sequence properties, a model is built that can be used to estimate MS-detectability (O (i)) for any given protein. (2) Absolute abundances of proteins measured in an MS/MS experiment are calculated with information from spectral counts, identification probabilities and the learned O (i)-values. (3) Simple statistics allow for significance analysis of differential expression in two distinct biological samples, i.e., measuring relative protein abundances. APEX-based protein abundances span more than four orders of magnitude and are applicable to mixtures of hundreds to thousands of proteins from any type of organism.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCell ExtractsFungal ProteinsHumansMolecular Sequence DataPeptide FragmentsPeptide MappingProteomeProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryCell ExtractsFungal ProteinsPeptide FragmentsProteome

Identifiers

PMID22665309
PMCPMC3654649
OpenAlexW203952661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.