ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2012
Analytical methods for immunogenetic population data.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- High resolution class I HLA-A, -B, and -C diversity in Eastern and Southern African populations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The HLA landscape of Colombia: a high-resolution analysis of 11,576 blood donors.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Killer-Cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptor Diversity in an Admixed South American Population.Cells · 2022Article
- High Resolution HLA ∼A, ∼B, ∼C, ∼DRB1, ∼DQA1, and ∼DQB1 Diversity in South African Populations.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- HLA Haplotype Frequencies and Genetic Profiles of the Kuwaiti Population.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2020Article
- Bridging ImmunoGenomic Data Analysis Workflow Gaps (BIGDAWG): An integrated case-control analysis pipeline.Human immunology · 2016Article
- Population tailored modification of tuberculosis specific interferon-gamma release assay.The Journal of infection · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this chapter, we describe analyses commonly applied to immunogenetic population data, along with software tools that are currently available to perform those analyses. Where possible, we focus on tools that have been developed specifically for the analysis of highly polymorphic immunogenetic data. These analytical methods serve both as a means to examine the appropriateness of a dataset for testing a specific hypothesis, as well as a means of testing hypotheses. Rather than treat this chapter as a protocol for analyzing any population dataset, each researcher and analyst should first consider their data, the possible analyses, and any available tools in light of the hypothesis being tested. The extent to which the data and analyses are appropriate to each other should be determined before any analyses are performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.