Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22664930›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2012

Iatrogenic obstruction after sling surgery.

Bhavin N Patel, Kathleen C Kobashi, David Staskin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Post-Sling Urinary Retention in Women.Current urology reports · 2016
    Review
  9. Female Bladder Outlet Obstruction.Current urology reports · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bhavin N PatelVirginia Mason Medical Center, Section of Urology and Renal Transplantation, C7-URO, 1100 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
Kathleen C KobashiVirginia Mason Medical Center, Section of Urology and Renal Transplantation, C7-URO, 1100 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
David StaskinSt Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sling surgery has supplanted other anti-incontinence procedures as the treatment of choice for stress urinary incontinence. Iatrogenic obstruction after sling surgery is increasingly reported as the procedure becomes more and more popular. The rate of retention (defined as catheter-dependency for at least 28 days) has been estimated at 1-10%. Iatrogenic obstruction after sling surgery has a variable presentation and can include urinary urgency, urgency incontinence, hesitancy, straining to void, weak urinary stream, nocturia, incomplete emptying, frequency, dysuria or urinary tract infections. The evaluation and diagnosis rely upon a thorough patient history, physical examination, a urine flow test and postvoid residual volume. Cystoscopy and pressure-flow studies can also be considered. The single most important factor in the diagnosis of sling-related obstruction or voiding dysfunction is the temporal relationship between the sling procedure and onset of symptoms. Transient urinary retention can be managed with indwelling or intermittent catheter drainage. For those patients with moderate or symptomatic retention, surgical options for treatment include sling loosening, sling incision, sling excision, and urethrolysis.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansIatrogenic DiseaseReoperationSuburethral SlingsUrethral ObstructionUrinary CatheterizationUrinary Incontinence, StressUrinary RetentionUrologic Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.