ArticleBMC systems biology2012
Yeast 5 - an expanded reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 143 citations in OpenAlex.
- Collaborative metabolic curation of an emerging model marine bacterium, Alteromonas macleodii ATCC 27126.PloS one · 2025Article
- Technologies for whole-cell modeling: Genome-wide reconstruction of a cell in silico.Development, growth & differentiation · 2023Review
- Standards, dissemination, and best practices in systems biology.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2023Review
- From Petri Plates to Petri Nets, a revolution in yeast biology.FEMS yeast research · 2022Article
- Genome-scale modeling of yeast metabolism: retrospectives and perspectives.FEMS yeast research · 2022Review
- Path to improving the life cycle and quality of genome-scale models of metabolism.Cell systems · 2021Review
- A genome-scale metabolic model of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that integrates expression constraints and reaction thermodynamics.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Evaluating accessibility, usability and interoperability of genome-scale metabolic models for diverse yeasts species.FEMS yeast research · 2021Article
- Leveraging Experimental Strategies to Capture Different Dimensions of Microbial Interactions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Systematically gap-filling the genome-scale metabolic model of CHO cells.Biotechnology letters · 2021Article
- Genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of the non-model yeastMetabolic engineering communications · 2020Article
- MOMO - multi-objective metabolic mixed integer optimization: application to yeast strain engineering.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Distributed flux balance analysis simulations of serial biomass fermentation by two organisms.PloS one · 2020Article
- A consensus S. cerevisiae metabolic model Yeast8 and its ecosystem for comprehensively probing cellular metabolism.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Current status and applications of genome-scale metabolic models.Genome biology · 2019Review
- SLIMEr: probing flexibility of lipid metabolism in yeast with an improved constraint-based modeling framework.BMC systems biology · 2019Article
- Next-Generation Genome-Scale Models Incorporating Multilevel 'Omics Data: From Yeast to Human.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019Article
- Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling from Yeast to Human Cell Models of Complex Diseases: Latest Advances and Challenges.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019Article
- The nutritional requirements ofGenes & nutrition · 2019Review
- Network inference reveals novel connections in pathways regulating growth and defense in the yeast salt response.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEfforts to improve the computational reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae biochemical reaction network and to refine the stoichiometrically constrained metabolic models that can be derived from such a reconstruction have continued since the first stoichiometrically constrained yeast genome scale metabolic model was published in 2003. Continuing this ongoing process, we have constructed an update to the Yeast Consensus Reconstruction, Yeast 5. The Yeast Consensus Reconstruction is a product of efforts to forge a community-based reconstruction emphasizing standards compliance and biochemical accuracy via evidence-based selection of reactions. It draws upon models published by a variety of independent research groups as well as information obtained from biochemical databases and primary literature.
resultsYeast 5 refines the biochemical reactions included in the reconstruction, particularly reactions involved in sphingolipid metabolism; updates gene-reaction annotations; and emphasizes the distinction between reconstruction and stoichiometrically constrained model. Although it was not a primary goal, this update also improves the accuracy of model prediction of viability and auxotrophy phenotypes and increases the number of epistatic interactions. This update maintains an emphasis on standards compliance, unambiguous metabolite naming, and computer-readable annotations available through a structured document format. Additionally, we have developed MATLAB scripts to evaluate the model's predictive accuracy and to demonstrate basic model applications such as simulating aerobic and anaerobic growth. These scripts, which provide an independent tool for evaluating the performance of various stoichiometrically constrained yeast metabolic models using flux balance analysis, are included as Additional files 1, 2 and 3.
conclusionsYeast 5 expands and refines the computational reconstruction of yeast metabolism and improves the predictive accuracy of a stoichiometrically constrained yeast metabolic model. It differs from previous reconstructions and models by emphasizing the distinction between the yeast metabolic reconstruction and the stoichiometrically constrained model, and makes both available as Additional file 4 and Additional file 5 and at http://yeast.sf.net/ as separate systems biology markup language (SBML) files. Through this separation, we intend to make the modeling process more accessible, explicit, transparent, and reproducible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.