ReviewExpert opinion on pharmacotherapy2012
Bendamustine for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Review in Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A decade of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia therapy in Germany: Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes (2010-2022).EJHaem · 2024Article
- Role of non-coding RNA networks in leukemia progression, metastasis and drug resistance.Molecular cancer · 2020Review
- Cost of Illness of Japanese Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), and Budget Impact of the Market Introduction of Ibrutinib.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2017Article
- Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2017Review
- Role of microRNAs in chemoresistance.Annals of translational medicine · 2015Review
- Human organic cation transporter 1 (hOCT1) as a mediator of bendamustine uptake and cytotoxicity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2015Article
- Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with bendamustine in an HIV-infected patient on antiretroviral therapy: a case report and review of the literature.Clinical case reports · 2015Article
- Cladribine and bendamustine exhibit inhibitory activity in dexamethasone-sensitive and -resistant multiple myeloma cells.American journal of translational research · 2013Article
- Targeted Therapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionChronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) often has an extended disease course. With a median age at diagnosis of 72 years, newer treatment options with less toxicity than standard nucleoside analogue-based regimens are needed. Historically, few therapy options are available once CLL has become refractory to nucleoside analogues. Bendamustine has emerged as a feasible therapy for older and less fit CLL patients, with clinical efficacy in previously untreated and refractory CLL. AREAS COVERED: This paper reviews several of the pivotal clinical trials that established the clinical activity of bendamustine in previously untreated and relapsed/refractory CLL. The toxicity profile of bendamustine, primarily myelosuppression and infections, is reviewed and compared across different CLL populations. A review of the clinical data focuses on potential explanations for differences in response rates and duration of remission reported across studies and how this may impact the development of therapies for CLL. EXPERT OPINION: Bendamustine is a valuable new agent for the management of CLL. Ongoing clinical trials are comparing bendamustine with standard CLL regimens in untreated disease, and investigating bendamustine combinations with novel targeted therapies and monoclonal antibodies. These studies will help to define the optimal role for bendamustine in CLL management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.