Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22662265›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Exome sequencing and genetic testing for MODY.

Stefan Johansson, Henrik Irgens, Kishan K Chudasama, Janne Molnes, Jan Aerts, Francisco S Roque, Inge Jonassen, Shawn Levy, Kari Lima, Per M Knappskog and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical and Genetic Characteristics ofJournal of diabetes research · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Monogenic diabetes: a gateway to precision medicine in diabetes.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Stefan JohanssonDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Henrik Irgens
Kishan K Chudasama
Janne Molnes
Jan Aerts
Francisco S Roque
Inge Jonassen
Shawn Levy
Kari Lima
Per M Knappskog
Graeme I Bell
Anders Molven
Pål R Njølstad
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOUni Research (Norway) · NOAkershus University Hospital · NOHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology · USUniversity of Chicago · USWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextGenetic testing for monogenic diabetes is important for patient care. Given the extensive genetic and clinical heterogeneity of diabetes, exome sequencing might provide additional diagnostic potential when standard Sanger sequencing-based diagnostics is inconclusive.

objectiveThe aim of the study was to examine the performance of exome sequencing for a molecular diagnosis of MODY in patients who have undergone conventional diagnostic sequencing of candidate genes with negative results. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe performed exome enrichment followed by high-throughput sequencing in nine patients with suspected MODY. They were Sanger sequencing-negative for mutations in the HNF1A, HNF4A, GCK, HNF1B and INS genes. We excluded common, non-coding and synonymous gene variants, and performed in-depth analysis on filtered sequence variants in a pre-defined set of 111 genes implicated in glucose metabolism.

resultsOn average, we obtained 45 X median coverage of the entire targeted exome and found 199 rare coding variants per individual. We identified 0-4 rare non-synonymous and nonsense variants per individual in our a priori list of 111 candidate genes. Three of the variants were considered pathogenic (in ABCC8, HNF4A and PPARG, respectively), thus exome sequencing led to a genetic diagnosis in at least three of the nine patients. Approximately 91% of known heterozygous SNPs in the target exomes were detected, but we also found low coverage in some key diabetes genes using our current exome sequencing approach. Novel variants in the genes ARAP1, GLIS3, MADD, NOTCH2 and WFS1 need further investigation to reveal their possible role in diabetes.

conclusionOur results demonstrate that exome sequencing can improve molecular diagnostics of MODY when used as a complement to Sanger sequencing. However, improvements will be needed, especially concerning coverage, before the full potential of exome sequencing can be realized.

Indexed as

ExomeSequence Analysis, DNAAdolescentAdultChildDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGenes, DominantGenetic TestingGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleMutationPedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotideYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22662265
PMCPMC3360646
OpenAlexW2019380425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.