Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22662235›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Integrative gene regulatory network analysis reveals light-induced regional gene expression phase shift programs in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Haisun Zhu, Rajanikanth Vadigepalli, Rachel Rafferty, Gregory E Gonye, David R Weaver, James S Schwaber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Circadian gene variants in cancer.Annals of medicine · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The circadian clock in cancer development and therapy.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haisun ZhuDaniel Baugh Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Rajanikanth Vadigepalli
Rachel Rafferty
Gregory E Gonye
David R Weaver
James S Schwaber
Thomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Modeling Central Autonomic Regulatory Network Adaptation to HypertensionR01HL111621 · NHLBI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWABER, JAMES, VADIGEPALLI, RAJANIKANTH · 2012 to 2015
$2.4M
Integrated Signaling and Transcriptional Networks in Circadian Clock NeuronsR01GM076495 · NIGMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWABER, JAMES · 2007 to 2010
$2.1M
Integrated Modeling of Adaptive Neuronal RegulationR01GM083108 · NIGMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWABER, JAMES, VADIGEPALLI, RAJANIKANTH · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111621NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076495NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM076495NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083108NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM083108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We use the multigenic pattern of gene expression across suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) regions and time to understand the dynamics within the SCN in response to a circadian phase-resetting light pulse. Global gene expression studies of the SCN indicate that circadian functions like phase resetting are complex multigenic processes. While the molecular dynamics of phase resetting are not well understood, it is clear they involve a "functional gene expression program", e.g., the coordinated behavior of functionally related genes in space and time. In the present study we selected a set of 89 of these functionally related genes in order to further understand this multigenic program. By use of high-throughput qPCR we studied 52 small samples taken by anatomically precise laser capture from within the core and shell SCN regions, and taken at time points with and without phase resetting light exposure. The results show striking regional differences in light response to be present in the mouse SCN. By using network-based analyses, we are able to establish a highly specific multigenic correlation between genes expressed in response to light at night and genes normally activated during the day. The light pulse triggers a complex and highly coordinated network of gene regulation. The largest differences marking neuroanatomical location are in transmitter receptors, and the largest time-dependent differences occur in clock-related genes. Nighttime phase resetting appears to recruit transcriptional regulatory processes normally active in the day. This program, or mechanism, causes the pattern of core region gene expression to transiently shift to become more like that of the shell region.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksLightAnimalsBiological ClocksCircadian RhythmCluster AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSuprachiasmatic Nucleus

Identifiers

PMID22662235
PMCPMC3360606
OpenAlexW1965310675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.