Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22662210›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Low dose vaccination with attenuated Francisella tularensis strain SchuS4 mutants protects against tularemia independent of the route of vaccination.

Dedeke Rockx-Brouwer, Audrey Chong, Tara D Wehrly, Robert Child, Deborah D Crane, Jean Celli, Catharine M Bosio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The rLVS ΔHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Tularemia vaccines.Folia microbiologica · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Tularaemia: a challenging zoonosis.Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Uncovering the components of the Francisella tularensis virulence stealth strategy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2014
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dedeke Rockx-BrouwerTularemia Pathogenesis Section, Laboratory of Intracellular Parasites, Rocky Mountain Laboratories National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases/National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, United States of America.
Audrey Chong
Tara D Wehrly
Robert Child
Deborah D Crane
Jean Celli
Catharine M Bosio
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Immunity to Pulmonary InfectionsZIAAI001013 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI BOSIO, CATHARINE · 2009 to 2025
$18.9M
Molecular Basis of Francisella tularensis-Macrophage InteractionsZIAAI000953 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI CELLI, JEAN · 2009 to 2013
$5.0M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tularemia, caused by the gram-negative bacterium Francisella tularensis, is a severe, sometimes fatal disease. Interest in tularemia has increased over the last decade due to its history as a biological weapon. In particular, development of novel vaccines directed at protecting against pneumonic tularemia has been an important goal. Previous work has demonstrated that, when delivered at very high inoculums, administration of live, highly attenuated strains of virulent F. tularensis can protect against tularemia. However, lower vaccinating inoculums did not offer similar immunity. One concern of using live vaccines is that the host may develop mild tularemia in response to infection and use of high inoculums may contribute to this issue. Thus, generation of a live vaccine that can efficiently protect against tularemia when delivered in low numbers, e.g. <100 organisms, may address this concern. Herein we describe the ability of three defined, attenuated mutants of F. tularensis SchuS4, deleted for FTT0369c, FTT1676, or FTT0369c and FTT1676, respectively, to engender protective immunity against tularemia when delivered at concentrations of approximately 50 or fewer bacteria. Attenuated strains for use as vaccines were selected by their inability to efficiently replicate in macrophages in vitro and impaired replication and dissemination in vivo. Although all strains were defective for replication in vitro within macrophages, protective efficacy of each attenuated mutant was correlated with their ability to modestly replicate and disseminate in the host. Finally, we demonstrate the parenteral vaccination with these strains offered superior protection against pneumonic tularemia than intranasal vaccination. Together our data provides proof of principle that low dose attenuated vaccines may be a viable goal in development of novel vaccines directed against tularemia.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial VaccinesFemaleFrancisella tularensisLethal Dose 50MiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMutationTularemiaVaccines, AttenuatedVirulenceBacterial VaccinesVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID22662210
PMCPMC3360632
OpenAlexW1974466073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.