Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22659977›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2012

[Nutrition in intensive care medicine].

M Hecker, T Felbinger, K Mayer

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Acute pancreatitis].Der Anaesthesist · 2014
    Review
  4. [Calories, proteins - what does the intensive care patient need?].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2014
    Review
  5. [Nutrition and acute respiratory failure].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2013
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M HeckerMedizinische Klinik II (Pneumologie/internistische Intensivmedizin), Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Standort Gießen, Klinikstr. 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland. Matthias.Hecker@innere.med.uni-giessen.de
T Felbinger
K Mayer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrition of intensive care patients is challenging due to complex metabolic changes. For this reason nutritional support adapted to the metabolic state is the only effective option to avoid hyperalimentation or hypoalimentation and thus has a direct influence on the prognosis. The analysis of the calorific requirement and the mode of administration are of key importance. An early enteral nutrition should be established, whereas in practice often a supplementary parenteral support is required to provide adequate calorie supply. Nowadays, most commercially available standard solutions are optimized concerning composition of nutrients; however, metabolic and gastrointestinal monitoring is recommended. In a selected group of patients the administration of immunomodulatory substances may be indicated but due to insufficient or conflicting study data an uncritical use of these supplements cannot be recommended.

Indexed as

Critical CareNutritional SupportAnimalsEnergy IntakeEnteral NutritionFood, FormulatedHumansImmunologic FactorsMonitoring, PhysiologicNutritional RequirementsParenteral NutritionParenteral Nutrition, TotalImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.