Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2012
CBT4BN versus CBTF2F: comparison of online versus face-to-face treatment for bulimia nervosa.
Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- An exploratory investigation of predictors of outcome in face-to-face and online cognitive-behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2022Trial
- Predictors of dropout in face-to-face and internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa in a randomized controlled trial.The International journal of eating disorders · 2017Trial
- CBT4BN: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Online Chat and Face-to-Face Group Therapy for Bulimia Nervosa.Psychotherapy and psychosomatics · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Bulimia Nervosa: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.The Journal of clinical psychiatryTrial
- Web-based guided self-help cognitive behavioral therapy-enhanced versus treatment as usual for binge-eating disorder: a randomized controlled trial protocol.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- The use of technology in the treatment of youth with eating disorders: A scoping review.Journal of eating disorders · 2022Article
- 'Isolated together': online group treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic review.Research in psychotherapy (Milano) · 2022Article
- It's raining men: descriptive results for engaging men with eating disorders in a specialized male assessment and treatment track (MATT).Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2018Article
- Exposure with response prevention (ERP) for body dissatisfaction in a group therapy format: an exploratory study.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2018Article
- The core symptoms of bulimia nervosa, anxiety, and depression: A network analysis.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2017Article
- Addressing critical gaps in the treatment of eating disorders.The International journal of eating disorders · 2017Review
- Evolution of cognitive-behavioral therapy for eating disorders.Behaviour research and therapy · 2017Review
- E-Health Interventions for Eating Disorders: Emerging Findings, Issues, and Opportunities.Current psychiatry reports · 2016Review
- Disseminating evidence-based psychological treatments for eating disorders.Current psychiatry reports · 2015Review
- The economics of eating disorder treatment.Current psychiatry reports · 2014Review
- Internet-based relapse prevention for anorexia nervosa: nine- month follow-up.Journal of eating disorders · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is currently the "gold standard" for treatment of bulimia nervosa (BN), and is effective for approximately 40-60% of individuals receiving treatment; however, the majority of individuals in need of care do not have access to CBT. New strategies for service delivery of CBT and for maximizing maintenance of treatment benefits are critical for improving our ability to treat BN. This clinical trial is comparing an Internet-based version of CBT (CBT4BN) in which group intervention is conducted via therapeutic chat group with traditional group CBT (CBTF2F) for BN conducted via face-to-face therapy group. The purpose of the trial is to determine whether manualized CBT delivered via the Internet is not inferior to the gold standard of manualized group CBT. In this two-site randomized controlled trial, powered for non-inferiority analyses, 180 individuals with BN are being randomized to either CBT4BN or CBTF2F. We hypothesize that CBT4BN will not be inferior to CBTF2F and that participants will value the convenience of an online intervention. If not inferior, CBT4BN may be a cost-effective approach to service delivery for individuals requiring treatment for BN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.