Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22658081›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2012

Automated selected reaction monitoring software for accurate label-free protein quantification.

Johan Teleman, Christofer Karlsson, Sofia Waldemarson, Karin Hansson, Peter James, Johan Malmström, Fredrik Levander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Quantitative proteomics analysis of cartilage response to mechanical injury and cytokine treatment.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. File formats commonly used in mass spectrometry proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johan TelemanProtein Technology, Department of Immunotechnology, Lund University, BMC D13, 22184 Lund, Sweden.
Christofer Karlsson
Sofia Waldemarson
Karin Hansson
Peter James
Johan Malmström
Fredrik Levander

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selected reaction monitoring (SRM) is a mass spectrometry method with documented ability to quantify proteins accurately and reproducibly using labeled reference peptides. However, the use of labeled reference peptides becomes impractical if large numbers of peptides are targeted and when high flexibility is desired when selecting peptides. We have developed a label-free quantitative SRM workflow that relies on a new automated algorithm, Anubis, for accurate peak detection. Anubis efficiently removes interfering signals from contaminating peptides to estimate the true signal of the targeted peptides. We evaluated the algorithm on a published multisite data set and achieved results in line with manual data analysis. In complex peptide mixtures from whole proteome digests of Streptococcus pyogenes we achieved a technical variability across the entire proteome abundance range of 6.5-19.2%, which was considerably below the total variation across biological samples. Our results show that the label-free SRM workflow with automated data analysis is feasible for large-scale biological studies, opening up new possibilities for quantitative proteomics and systems biology.

Indexed as

SoftwareAdaptation, PhysiologicalAlgorithmsBacterial ProteinsBiosynthetic PathwaysCulture MediaFatty AcidsHumansMass SpectrometryPeptide MappingPlasmaProteomeProteomicsReference StandardsStatistics, NonparametricStreptococcus pyogenesBacterial ProteinsCulture MediaFatty AcidsProteome

Identifiers

PMID22658081
PMCPMC3426189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.