Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22656865›Full record

Trial reportRadiation oncology (London, England)2012

Short course radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for stage I-II breast cancer, early toxicities of a randomized clinical trial.

Hilde Van Parijs, Geertje Miedema, Vincent Vinh-Hung, Sylvia Verbanck, Nele Adriaenssens, Dirk Kerkhove, Truus Reynders, Daniel Schuermans, Katrien Leysen, Shane Hanon and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00459628 naunknown statusnot on this map

Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional vs Short-course Reduced Volume Conformal Post-surgery Radiation Treatment in Women With Stage I or II Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorVrije Universiteit BrusselRan2007 to 2017Enrolled118ConditionsBreast NeoplasmsArmsConventional radiotherapy, Tomotherapy
NCT02858934 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility Study of Accelerated Preoperative Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAndre NazacRan2017 to 2022Enrolled24ConditionsBreast CancerArmsTomotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ultra-hypofractionated 5-fraction radiation therapy for early breast cancer into whole breast and regional nodes: experience in a tertiary hospital.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Hilde Van ParijsDepartment of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. hilde.vanparijs@uzbrussel.be
Geertje Miedema
Vincent Vinh-Hung
Sylvia Verbanck
Nele Adriaenssens
Dirk Kerkhove
Truus Reynders
Daniel Schuermans
Katrien Leysen
Shane Hanon
Guy Van Camp
Walter Vincken
Guy Storme
Dirk Verellen
Mark De Ridder
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BEMathys (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTomoBreast is a unicenter, non-blinded randomized trial comparing conventional radiotherapy (CR) vs. hypofractionated Tomotherapy (TT) for post-operative treatment of breast cancer. The purpose of the trial is to compare whether TT can reduce heart and pulmonary toxicity. We evaluate early toxicities.

methodsThe trial started inclusion in May 2007 and reached its recruitment in August 2011. Women with stage T1-3N0M0 or T1-2N1M0 breast cancer completely resected by tumorectomy (BCS) or by mastectomy (MA) who consented to participate were randomized, according to a prescribed computer-generated randomization schedule, between control arm of CR 25x2 Gy/5 weeks by tangential fields on breast/chest wall, plus supraclavicular-axillary field if node-positive, and sequential boost 8x2 Gy/2 weeks if BCS (cumulative dose 66 Gy/7 weeks), versus experimental TT arm of 15x2.8 Gy/3 weeks, including nodal areas if node-positive and simultaneous integrated boost of 0.6 Gy if BCS (cumulative dose 51 Gy/3 weeks). Outcomes evaluated were the pulmonary and heart function. Comparison of proportions used one-sided Fisher's exact test.

resultsBy May 2010, 70 patients were randomized and had more than 1 year of follow-up. Out of 69 evaluable cases, 32 were assigned to CR (21 BCS, 11 MA), 37 to TT (20 BCS, 17 MA). Skin toxicity of grade ≥1 at 2 years was 60% in CR, vs. 30% in TT arm. Heart function showed no significant difference for left ventricular ejection fraction at 2 years, CR 4.8% vs. TT 4.6%. Pulmonary function tests at 2 years showed grade ≥1 decline of FEV1 in 21% of CR, vs. 15% of TT and decline of DLco in 29% of CR, vs. 7% of TT (P = 0.05).

conclusionsThere were no unexpected severe toxicities. Short course radiotherapy of the breast with simultaneous integrated boost over 3 weeks proved feasible without excess toxicities. Pulmonary tests showed a slight trend in favor of Tomotherapy, which will need confirmation with longer follow-up of patients.

trial registration[corrected] ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00459628.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHeartHumansLungMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID22656865
PMCPMC3432009
OpenAlexW2105361492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.