Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22656403›Full record

Trial reportTelemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association

Patient and phaRmacist telephonic encounters (PARTE) in an underserved rural patient population with asthma: results of a pilot study.

Henry N Young, S Nadra Havican, Sara Griesbach, Joshua M Thorpe, Betty A Chewning, Christine A Sorkness

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The experience of shared decision-making for people with asthma: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Home telemonitoring and remote feedback between clinic visits for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  9. Remote versus face-to-face check-ups for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Allergy and Asthma Care in the Mobile Phone Era.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Barriers to medication use in rural underserved patients with asthma.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Henry N YoungSocial and Administrative Sciences Division, Sonderegger Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA. hnyoung@pharmacy.wisc.edu
S Nadra Havican
Sara Griesbach
Joshua M Thorpe
Betty A Chewning
Christine A Sorkness
University of Wisconsin System · USMarshfield Clinic · USMarshfield Clinic · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCRR NIH HHS 1UL1RR025011NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of a telepharmacy intervention in an underserved, rural asthma patient population. SUBJECTS AND

methodsPatients with asthma were randomized to receive either standard care or telephone consultations from pharmacists regarding asthma self-management over a 3-month period. Qualitative interviews were conducted to identify participants' attitudes/opinions regarding the intervention. Baseline and follow-up surveys assessed asthma control, patient activation, and medication utilization.

resultsNinety-eight adults were recruited (78% accrual); 83 completed the study (15% dropout). Participants reported positive opinions and believed the intervention improved their asthma self-management. The intervention group had significantly higher patient activation compared with the control (p<0.05). There were no significant between-group differences regarding asthma control. However, within-group analyses of the intervention group showed an improvement in asthma control (p<0.01) and medication adherence (p<0.01). No within-group differences were found for the control group.

conclusionsThis telepharmacy intervention is feasible and showed indicators of effectiveness, suggesting the design is well suited for a robust study to evaluate its impact in uncontrolled asthma patients. Pharmacists helping patients manage asthma through telecommunications may resolve access barriers and improve care.

Indexed as

Medically Underserved AreaProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaConfidence IntervalsFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPatient CarePilot ProjectsRural PopulationSelf CareAnti-Asthmatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID22656403
PMCPMC3399112
OpenAlexW2020242026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.