Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22655535›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2012

Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI.

Leah Muller, Maythem Saeed, Mark W Wilson, Steven W Hetts

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intelligent Soft Opto-Magnetic Robot for Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Magnetically steerable catheters: State of the art review.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. State of the Art and Future Opportunities in MRI-Guided Robot-Assisted Surgery and Interventions.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. MagnetoSuture: Tetherless Manipulation of Suture Needles.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2020
    Article
  11. Towards Autonomous Control of Magnetic Suture Needles.Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · 2020
    Article
  12. Catheter steering in interventional cardiology: Mechanical analysis and novel solution.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Iterative Jacobian-Based Inverse Kinematics and Open-Loop Control of an MRI-Guided Magnetically Actuated Steerable Catheter System.IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics : a joint publication of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society and the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leah MullerDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, L-352, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, USA. steven.hetts@ucsf.edu
Maythem Saeed
Mark W Wilson
Steven W Hetts

Funding

Endovascular Magnetic Catheter for Interventional MRIR01EB012031 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HETTS, STEVEN WILLIAM, MARTIN, ALASTAIR J · 2011 to 2021
$4.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB012031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImage-guided endovascular interventions have gained increasing popularity in clinical practice, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is emerging as an attractive alternative to X-ray fluoroscopy for guiding such interventions. Steering catheters by remote control under MRI guidance offers unique challenges and opportunities.

methodsIn this review, the benefits and limitations of MRI-guided remote control intervention are addressed, and the tools for guiding such interventions in the magnetic environment are summarized. Designs for remote control catheter guidance include a catheter tip electromagnetic microcoil design, a ferromagnetic sphere-tipped catheter design, smart material-actuated catheters, and hydraulically actuated catheters. Remote control catheter guidance systems were compared and contrasted with respect to visualization, safety, and performance. Performance is characterized by bending angles achievable by the catheter, time to achieve bending, degree of rotation achievable, and miniaturization capacity of the design. Necessary improvements for furthering catheter design, especially for use in the MRI environment, are addressed, as are hurdles that must be overcome in order to make MRI guided endovascular procedures more accessible for regular use in clinical practice.

conclusionsMR-guided endovascular interventions under remote control steering are in their infancy due to issues regarding safety and reliability. Additional experimental studies are needed prior to their use in humans.

Indexed as

CathetersMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalRoboticsEndovascular ProceduresEquipment DesignHumansMiniaturizationTherapy, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID22655535
PMCPMC3461467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.