Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22655140›Full record

ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2011

Internal medicine physicians' knowledge of health care charges.

Raj Tek Sehgal, Paul Gorman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cost health literacy as a physician skill-set: the relationship between oncologist reported knowledge and engagement with patients on financial toxicity.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Faculty Development Workshop for High-Value Care Education Across Clinical Settings.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Can Emergency Medicine Residents Predict Cost of Diagnostic Testing?The western journal of emergency medicine · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Cutting the Cost of Health Care: The Physician's Role.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Financial Impact of Incentive Spirometry.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raj Tek Sehgal
Paul Gorman
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

OREGON CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR024140 · NCRR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ORWOLL, ERIC S. · 2006 to 2011
$61.1M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcerns over the rising costs of health care have increased interest in educating residents about the cost impact of medical decisions. While many programs educate residents about the effectiveness of care, little is known about how well residents and faculty know charges of diagnostic tests or both groups' interest in this topic.

methodsWe surveyed internal medicine residents and faculty at an academic tertiary care hospital. Both groups rated their agreement with a series of statements about health care charges on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree), and they estimated the charges for 15 commonly ordered diagnostic tests. Estimates within 25% of the true charge were considered correct. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare responses between residents and faculty.

resultsSeventy of 126 eligible participants (56%) returned surveys. Participants showed poor knowledge of health care charges but expressed a desire to learn more. Physicians also felt that cost-effectiveness should be considered when ordering diagnostic tests, although faculty members felt more strongly about this than did residents. In estimating the charges for diagnostic tests, less than a quarter of all responses were within 25% of the true charge.

conclusionsInternal medicine physicians poorly estimate the charges for diagnostic tests but have a strong desire to improve their knowledge, suggesting a possible intervention to improve the cost-effectiveness of medical care.

Identifiers

PMID22655140
PMCPMC3184926
OpenAlexW2074552764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.