Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22655046›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Full-exon pyrosequencing screening of BRCA germline mutations in Mexican women with inherited breast and ovarian cancer.

Felipe Vaca-Paniagua, Rosa María Alvarez-Gomez, Verónica Fragoso-Ontiveros, Silvia Vidal-Millan, Luis Alonso Herrera, David Cantú, Enrique Bargallo-Rocha, Alejandro Mohar, César López-Camarillo, Carlos Pérez-Plasencia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pathogenic variants inJournal of medicine and life · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Phytoconstituents in photoaging: therapeutic potential in prevention and regeneration.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetic Variants in the 3'UTR ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A RecurrentCancers · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Genomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Among Latinas.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center · 2016
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Mexican women with breast cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Felipe Vaca-PaniaguaLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, México.
Rosa María Alvarez-Gomez
Verónica Fragoso-Ontiveros
Silvia Vidal-Millan
Luis Alonso Herrera
David Cantú
Enrique Bargallo-Rocha
Alejandro Mohar
César López-Camarillo
Carlos Pérez-Plasencia
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hereditary breast cancer comprises 10% of all breast cancers. The most prevalent genes causing this pathology are BRCA1 and BRCA2 (breast cancer early onset 1 and 2), which also predispose to other cancers. Despite the outstanding relevance of genetic screening of BRCA deleterious variants in patients with a history of familial cancer, this practice is not common in Latin American public institutions. In this work we assessed mutations in the entire exonic and splice-site regions of BRCA in 39 patients with breast and ovarian cancer and with familial history of breast cancer or with clinical features suggestive for BRCA mutations by massive parallel pyrosequencing. First we evaluated the method with controls and found 41-485 reads per sequence in BRCA pathogenic mutations. Negative controls did not show deleterious variants, confirming the suitability of the approach. In patients diagnosed with cancer we found 4 novel deleterious mutations (c.2805_2808delAGAT and c.3124_3133delAGCAATATTA in BRCA1; c.2639_2640delTG and c.5114_5117delTAAA in BRCA2). The prevalence of BRCA mutations in these patients was 10.2%. Moreover, we discovered 16 variants with unknown clinical significance (11 in exons and 5 in introns); 4 were predicted as possibly pathogenic by in silico analyses, and 3 have not been described previously. This study illustrates how massive pyrosequencing technology can be applied to screen for BRCA mutations in the whole exonic and splice regions in patients with suspected BRCA-related cancers. This is the first effort to analyse the mutational status of BRCA genes on a Mexican-mestizo population by means of pyrosequencing.

Indexed as

Germ-Line MutationAdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMexicoOvarian NeoplasmsOvaryPedigreeYoung AdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 Protein

Identifiers

PMID22655046
PMCPMC3360054
OpenAlexW2064371144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.