ArticleIndian journal of microbiology2011
Comparative Seroepidemiologic Analysis of Chlamydophila Pneumoniae Infection using Microimmunofluorescence, Enzyme Immunoassay and Neutralization Test: Implications for Serodiagnosis.
Article in Indian journal of microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-chlamydial IgG Neutralizing Ability in Nonzoonotic Atypical Community Acquired Respiratory Tract Infections.Indian journal of microbiology · 2015Article
- Preparation and evaluation of monoclonal antibodies against chlamydial protease-like activity factor to detect Chlamydia pneumoniae antigen in early pediatric pneumonia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015Article
- [Chlamydia trachomaatis DNA in leukocytes of peripheral blood from neonates].Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinicaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A seroepidemiologic study using the microimmunofluorescence (MIF) technique was conducted to determine the prevalence of Chlamydophila pneumoniae IgG antibodies among 205 healthy Singapore university undergraduates using the MRL Diagnostics MIF test kit. The overall seroprevalence was 35.1% with significantly higher seropositivity rates among males than females (48.2 vs. 18.7%, P < 0.001). A comparative study using the Labsystems MIF test kit was conducted on sera from 192 students. Using the MRL MIF test as the reference, the sensitivity and specificity of Labsystems MIF test were 92.6 and 87.9%, respectively. A total of 78 samples comprising 15 MIF-negative and 63 MIF-positive samples were also tested for complement-independent neutralizing antibodies in vitro. All the 78 samples and 11 additional MIF-negative samples were also tested for IgM, IgG and IgA against C. pneumoniae by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) using the Labsystems EIA test kit. None of these 89 samples were seropositive for IgM. The percentages of IgG and IgA seropositivity increased with increasing grades of MIF-positivity. Among the IgG seropositive samples, 69.1% were also positive for IgA, suggesting that a high proportion of infected individuals also had IgA antibodies denoting chronicity. Neutralizing antibodies were detected in 22.2% of MIF-positive sera, but only in 6.7% of MIF-negative sera. 26.4 and 34.2% of samples which were IgG and IgA seropositive respectively also exhibited neutralizing activity. The percentages of MIF-positive sera with neutralizing activity increased with the grade of MIF positivity, i.e. 0% (1+), 7.1% (2+), 18.8% (3+), and 63.6% (4+). High-grade MIF positivity (particularly with MRL MIF kits) may represent a useful serologic marker of predictive value for neutralizing activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.