Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22654115›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2012

Mapping of potent and specific binding motifs, GLOGEN and GVOGEA, for integrin α1β1 using collagen toolkits II and III.

Samir W Hamaia, Nicholas Pugh, Nicolas Raynal, Benjamin Némoz, Rachael Stone, Donald Gullberg, Dominique Bihan, Richard W Farndale

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Targeting integrin pathways: mechanisms and advances in therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  11. Regenerative biomaterials · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Prokaryotic Collagen-Like Proteins as Novel Biomaterials.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Can the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Bind Integrins Independent of the RGD Sequence?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samir W HamaiaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QW, United Kingdom.
Nicholas Pugh
Nicolas Raynal
Benjamin Némoz
Rachael Stone
Donald Gullberg
Dominique Bihan
Richard W Farndale
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400701Medical Research Council G0500707Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrins are well characterized cell surface receptors for extracellular matrix proteins. Mapping integrin-binding sites within the fibrillar collagens identified GFOGER as a high affinity site recognized by α2β1, but with lower affinity for α1β1. Here, to identify specific ligands for α1β1, we examined binding of the recombinant human α1 I domain, the rat pheochromocytoma cell line (PC12), and the rat glioma Rugli cell line to our collagen Toolkit II and III peptides using solid-phase and real-time label-free adhesion assays. We observed Mg(2+)-dependent binding of the α1 I domain to the peptides in the following rank order: III-7 (GLOGEN), II-28 (GFOGER), II-7 and II-8 (GLOGER), II-18 (GAOGER), III-4 (GROGER). PC12 cells showed a similar profile. Using antibody blockade, we confirmed that binding of PC12 cells to peptide III-7 was mediated by integrin α1β1. We also identified a new α1β1-binding activity within peptide II-27. The sequence GVOGEA bound weakly to PC12 cells and strongly to activated Rugli cells or to an activated α1 I domain, but not to the α2 I domain or to C2C12 cells expressing α2β1 or α11β1. Thus, GVOGEA is specific for α1β1. Although recognized by both α2β1 and α11β1, GLOGEN is a better ligand for α1β1 compared with GFOGER. Finally, using biosensor assays, we show that although GLOGEN is able to compete for the α1 I domain from collagen IV (IC(50) ∼3 μm), GFOGER is much less potent (IC(50) ∼90 μm), as shown previously. These data confirm the selectivity of GFOGER for α2β1 and establish GLOGEN as a high affinity site for α1β1.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBinding, CompetitiveBinding SitesCell AdhesionCollagen Type IICollagen Type IIICollagen Type IVHumansIntegrin alpha1beta1Integrin alpha2MiceMolecular Sequence DataPC12 CellsPeptide FragmentsCollagen Type IICollagen Type IIICollagen Type IVIntegrin alpha1beta1Integrin alpha2Peptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID22654115
PMCPMC3406685
OpenAlexW2017105523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.