Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22654083›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2012

Primary prevention: exposure reduction, skin exposure and respiratory protection.

Dick Heederik, Paul K Henneberger, Carrie A Redlich, ERS Task Force on the Management of Work-related Asthma

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Treatment of Allergies to Fur Animals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Occupational Exposure to Diisocyanates in the European Union.Annals of work exposures and health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Occupational Exposure to Flour Dust. Exposure Assessment and Effectiveness of Control Measures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Workplace interventions for treatment of occupational asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Asthma medication use among adults with current asthma by work-related asthma status, Asthma Call-back Survey, 29 states, 2012-2013.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dick HeederikDivision of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands. d.j.j.heederik@uu.nl
Paul K Henneberger
Carrie A Redlich
ERS Task Force on the Management of Work-related Asthma
Utrecht University · NLCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventions for the primary prevention of occupational asthma have been reported in the medical literature, understanding the effectiveness of these efforts could help future interventions. The aim of our study was to evaluate the existing knowledge regarding the impact of controlling work exposure on the prevention of occupational asthma. We conducted systematic literature searches through April 2010 to examine if control of workplace exposures is effective for primary prevention of sensitisation and occupational asthma. The literature search for primary prevention of occupational asthma yielded 29 studies. Assessment of the available information led to the following conclusions and recommendations concerning primary prevention of occupational asthma. Exposure elimination is the strongest and preferred primary preventive approach to reduce the burden of occupational asthma. If elimination is not possible, exposure reduction is the second best option for primary prevention of occupational asthma. The evidence for the effectiveness of respirators in preventing occupational asthma is limited, and other options higher in the list of controls for occupational exposures, notably eliminating or minimising exposures at the source or in the environment, should be used preferentially. There is strong evidence to recommend not using powdered allergen-rich natural rubber latex gloves. There is weak evidence that suggests workers should minimise skin exposure to asthma-inducing agents.

Indexed as

Asthma, OccupationalGloves, ProtectiveHumansOccupational ExposurePrimary PreventionRespiratory Protective DevicesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22654083
PMCPMC9487304
OpenAlexW2154763823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.