Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22653940›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Dental Association (1939)2012

The effect of training on the use of tobacco-use cessation guidelines in dental settings.

Margaret M Walsh, Marilyn Belek, Preeti Prakash, Barbara Grimes, Barbara Heckman, Nathan Kaufman, Richard Meckstroth, Catherine Kavanagh, Jana Murray, Jane A Weintraub and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret M WalshDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 94143-1361, USA. margaret.walsh@ucsf.edu
Marilyn Belek
Preeti Prakash
Barbara Grimes
Barbara Heckman
Nathan Kaufman
Richard Meckstroth
Catherine Kavanagh
Jana Murray
Jane A Weintraub
Steven Silverstein
Stuart A Gansky
University of California, San Francisco · USDelta Air Lines (United States) · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

UCSF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR024131 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$111.2M
Reimbursement and Intensity of Dentists'TrainingR01DA017973 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WALSH, MARGARET MARY · 2003 to 2007
$2.4M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024131NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017973NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increase in the number of dentists conducting tobacco-use cessation treatment is needed. The authors assessed the effects of high-intensity training (HIT) or low-intensity training (LIT) and reimbursement on general dentists' tobacco-use-related attitudes and treatment behaviors.

methodsThe authors randomly selected 265 dentists in three states and assigned them to one of five groups: HIT workshop groups with and without tobacco-use cessation counseling reimbursement, LIT mailed self-study groups with and without reimbursement or a control group. Outcomes at follow-up were dentists' self-reported tobacco-use-related attitudes and behaviors and patients' reports of dentists' behaviors.

resultsSignificantly more dentists in the intervention groups reported having positive attitudes and behaviors at follow-up than did dentists in the control group. Dentists in the HIT groups, however, reported assessing patients' willingness to quit and assisting them with the quitting process significantly more often than did dentists in the LIT groups. Significantly more patients of dentists in the intervention groups who used tobacco reported receiving advice and assistance from their dentists than did patients of dentists in the control group. Adding reimbursement to HIT or LIT conditions did not provide additional intervention effect.

conclusionDentists trained by means of a workshop or self-study program used components of a recommended guideline more frequently and felt more positive toward tobacco-use cessation counseling than did dentists in the control group. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Although the workshop training was more successful than the self-study training, the latter's reach among dentists could have a more significant public health impact. The effect of reimbursement needs further study.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEducation, Dental, ContinuingTobacco Use CessationCaliforniaChi-Square DistributionDentistsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPennsylvaniaPractice Guidelines as TopicRemunerationStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID22653940
PMCPMC4130169
OpenAlexW2051977719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.