Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22653923›Full record

ArticleMolecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.)2012

Allosteric conversation in the androgen receptor ligand-binding domain surfaces.

Solène Grosdidier, Laia R Carbó, Víctor Buzón, Greg Brooke, Phuong Nguyen, John D Baxter, Charlotte Bevan, Paul Webb, Eva Estébanez-Perpiñá, Juan Fernández-Recio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Discovery of Novel Anti-Resistance AR Antagonists Guided by Funnel Metadynamics Simulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Androgen Receptor Dependence.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Solène GrosdidierJoint BSC-IRB Research Programme in Computational Biology, Life Sciences Department, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Laia R Carbó
Víctor Buzón
Greg Brooke
Phuong Nguyen
John D Baxter
Charlotte Bevan
Paul Webb
Eva Estébanez-Perpiñá
Juan Fernández-Recio
Houston Methodist · USImperial College London · GBUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya · ESInstitut de Biomedicina de la Universitat de Barcelona

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Androgen receptor (AR) is a major therapeutic target that plays pivotal roles in prostate cancer (PCa) and androgen insensitivity syndromes. We previously proposed that compounds recruited to ligand-binding domain (LBD) surfaces could regulate AR activity in hormone-refractory PCa and discovered several surface modulators of AR function. Surprisingly, the most effective compounds bound preferentially to a surface of unknown function [binding function 3 (BF-3)] instead of the coactivator-binding site [activation function 2 (AF-2)]. Different BF-3 mutations have been identified in PCa or androgen insensitivity syndrome patients, and they can strongly affect AR activity. Further, comparison of AR x-ray structures with and without bound ligands at BF-3 and AF-2 showed structural coupling between both pockets. Here, we combine experimental evidence and molecular dynamic simulations to investigate whether BF-3 mutations affect AR LBD function and dynamics possibly via allosteric conversation between surface sites. Our data indicate that AF-2 conformation is indeed closely coupled to BF-3 and provide mechanistic proof of their structural interconnection. BF-3 mutations may function as allosteric elicitors, probably shifting the AR LBD conformational ensemble toward conformations that alter AF-2 propensity to reorganize into subpockets that accommodate N-terminal domain and coactivator peptides. The induced conformation may result in either increased or decreased AR activity. Activating BF-3 mutations also favor the formation of another pocket (BF-4) in the vicinity of AF-2 and BF-3, which we also previously identified as a hot spot for a small compound. We discuss the possibility that BF-3 may be a protein-docking site that binds to the N-terminal domain and corepressors. AR surface sites are attractive pharmacological targets to develop allosteric modulators that might be alternative lead compounds for drug design.

Indexed as

Protein ConformationAndrogen-Insensitivity SyndromeBinding SitesCell Line, TumorHeLa CellsHumansLigandsMaleModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationProstatic NeoplasmsProtein BindingProtein FoldingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein Structure, TertiaryLigandsReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID22653923
PMCPMC5416996
OpenAlexW2081210324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.