ArticleFolia microbiologica2012
Simple sets for digital microphotography used and tested in the study of microorganisms.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous use of Interphako interference contrast and polarization microscopy in the study of microorganisms.Folia microbiologica · 2021Article
- Simultaneous use of polarization microscopy and dark field techniques in the study of microorganisms.Folia microbiologica · 2021Article
- Concomitant use of polarization and negative phase contrast microscopy for the study of microorganisms.Folia microbiologica · 2018Article
- Effect of metal ions on autofluorescence of the dry rot fungus Serpula lacrymans grown on spruce wood.Folia microbiologica · 2016Article
- Concomitant use of polarization and positive phase contrast microscopy for the study of microbial cells.Folia microbiologica · 2015Article
- Anisotropic structures of some microorganisms studied by polarization microscopy.Folia microbiologica · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Four simple sets for digital microphotography are described that have been tested with the Carl Zeiss Jena, Meopta Prague, Lambda Prague, and LOMO Sankt Petersburg microscopes and with DSLR Nikon D 70 and Nikon D 300 cameras. They permit precise image focusing in the camera using a prism Zeiss. The sets make use of commonly available extensions Zeiss, Praktica and reductions Nikon-Praktica manufactured by ROWI (without a lens) or HAMA (with a lens). An extension has further been designed and manufactured for connecting the DSLR Nikon D 300 camera fitted with the HAMA reduction (only with a lens) and a focusing extensible prism with Zeiss Jena light measurement. It permits a precise image focusing of low light intensity objects (autofluorescence or low-contrast or moving objects when using positive or negative phase contrast). The sets are applicable to all microscopes constructed according to German DIN industrial standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22653789What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.