Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22653684›Full record

ArticleHealth education research2013

The role of home smoking bans in limiting exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke in Hungary.

Edit Paulik, Á Maróti-Nagy, L Nagymajtényi, T Rogers, D Easterling

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health education research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Edit PaulikDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary. paulik.edit@med.u-szeged.hu
Á Maróti-Nagy
L Nagymajtényi
T Rogers
D Easterling
University of Szeged · HURTI International · US

Funding

Increasing Capacity for Tobacco Research in HungaryR01TW007927 · FIC · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
FIC NIH HHS 1 R01 TW007927-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective was to assess how exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke occurs in Hungarian homes, particularly among non-smokers, and to examine the effectiveness of home smoking bans in eliminating exposure to secondhand smoke at home. In 2009, 2286 non-smokers and smokers aged 16-70 years, who were selected randomly from a nationally representative sample of 48 Hungarian settlements, completed paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaires addressing tobacco-related attitudes, opinions and behaviors. Chi-square tests, one-way analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the effect of demographics, socio-economic characteristics and home smoking policies on the risk of exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke at home. Significantly higher risk of exposure was found among younger, lower educated and poorer people and among those having no or partial home smoking restrictions. There was a significant interaction between education level and home smoking policies: the effect of a smoking ban on exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke was stronger for the lower educated group than the higher educated group. The results suggest that Hungarians are making good progress in implementing home smoking bans, and that in the majority of population these bans are working. More can be done to promote the uptake of home smoking bans among poorer and less educated subpopulations.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHousingSmokingAdolescentAdultAgedHumansHungaryMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco Smoke PollutionYoung AdultTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID22653684
PMCPMC3549583
OpenAlexW2109042855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.