Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22653368›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2013

A cross-sectional study of constipation and laxative use in advanced cancer patients: insights for revision of current practice.

Chung Wah Cheng, Annie Ol Kwok, Zhao Xiang Bian, Doris Mw Tse

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Response to "A cross-sectional study of constipation and laxative use in advanced cancer patients: insights for revision of current practise".Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessment of Constipation in Patients With Cancer.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chung Wah ChengYan Chai Hospital-Hong Kong Baptist University Clinical Centre for Training and Research in Chinese Medicine (West Kowloon), Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Annie Ol Kwok
Zhao Xiang Bian
Doris Mw Tse
Caritas Medical Centre · CNHong Kong Baptist University · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the bowel habit and laxative use in advanced cancer patients with constipation in palliative care unit.

methodsIt was a cross-sectional study using a self-designed questionnaire.

resultsA total of 225 patients were analysed. Among all patients, 92.0 % (207 patients) had any intervention for relief of constipation, including laxatives, suppositories, enemas, digital evacuation and Chinese herbal medicine, and 65.3 % (147 patients) were on laxatives prescribed by our doctors. The severity of constipation as assessed by the constipation visual analogue scale (CVAS) (0-7, 7 = most severe) was reported as no constipation (0-1) in 19.6 % of patients, constipation (2-4) in 50.7 % and severe constipation (5-7) in 29.8 %. More patients with severe constipation, as compared with patients with constipation and no constipation, reported inadequate pushing force (83.6 vs. 47.4 vs. 6.8 %), sense of incomplete defecation (40.3 vs. 14.9 vs. 6.8 %) and difficult defecation (58.2 vs. 26.3 vs. 0 %), all p < 0.001, but there was no difference in stool types as assessed by Bristol Stool Scale (p = 0.303). Patients not on opioids, as compared with patients on strong opioids, had similar CVAS scores and description of constipation but had least laxatives prescribed (60.2 vs. 78.9 %, p = 0.012).

conclusionEvaluation of constipation should not rely on stool form or consistency alone, and patient's description of constipation is worth consideration. Constipation is also a problem in patients not on opioids and more attention is required. A revisit to existing guidelines is needed.

Indexed as

LaxativesPalliative CareAgedAnalgesics, OpioidComorbidityConstipationCross-Sectional StudiesDrug UtilizationFemaleHong KongHumansMaleMedicine, Chinese TraditionalNeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidLaxatives

Identifiers

PMID22653368
OpenAlexW2086929793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.