ArticleDer Orthopade2012
[Economic impact of infected total hip arthroplasty in the German diagnosis-related groups system].
Article in Der Orthopade, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Value of C-Reactive Protein in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of Externally Transferred and Self-Recruited Patients with Hip and Knee Revision Arthroplasty at a Certified Maximum-Care Arthroplasty Center (ACmax).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- [Comparison of DRG revenues between fast and slow-track procedures for a two-stage replacement of prostheses for periprosthetic hip infections in the aG-DRG system 2020].Der Orthopade · 2021Article
- The effect of surgical suture material on osteoclast generation and implant-loosening.International journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
- IgY Targeting Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Molecules in Implant-Associated Infections.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Cost-effectiveness of timelyOrthopedic reviews · 2017Article
- [Infections of hip and knee endoprostheses. Spectrum of pathogens and the role of multiresistant bacteria].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016Article
- [Hybrid and uncemented hip arthroplasty: Contribution margin in the German lump sum reimbursement system].Der Orthopade · 2015Article
- Diagnostic work-up strategy for periprosthetic joint infections after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a 12-year experience on 320 consecutive cases.Patient safety in surgery · 2015Article
- Treatment of periprosthetic infections: an economic analysis.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2013Review
- A model of implant-associated infection in the tibial metaphysis of rats.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2013Article
- Economical analysis on prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment of periprosthetic infections.The open orthopaedics journal · 2013Article
- Social profile and cost analysis of deep infection following total hip replacement surgery.Revista brasileira de ortopediaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment of an infected total hip arthroplasty is becoming an increasing economic problem. The additional costs of treatment are insufficiently represented in the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) categories. The aim of this study was to clarify whether the costs can be covered under the German DRG system and to identify the extent of the surplus or negative balance. PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of the treatment costs of total hip arthroplasty was carried out. Data from all patients treated at the orthopedic clinic of the University Hospital in Rostock were collected from patient records and from the hospital information system and calculation of the personnel and material costs using data from the central pharmacy and control centre of the University of Rostock.
resultsIn this study a total of 49 patients were included. The average treatment costs were 29,331.36 EUR per patient for an infected and 6,263.59 EUR for a primarily non-infected total hip arthroplasty. A comparison between the calculated and compensated costs resulted in an average deficit of 12,685.60 EUR per patient and an average surplus of 781.41 EUR per patient in the control group.
conclusionsAn economically viable treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty was not possible mostly due to the increased personnel and material costs but also to the lack of inclusion of the procedures in the DRG system. Further multicenter cost analysis studies and extensive quality assurance measures are necessary with respect to a comprehensive medical standard for a medically meaningful and economically reasonable treatment of periprosthetic infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22653328What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.