Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22652877›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioscience (Scholar edition)2012

Autophagy: mechanism and physiological relevance 'brewed' from yeast studies.

Rodney J Devenish, Daniel J Klionsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioscience (Scholar edition), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. APOE4 impairs autophagy and Aβ clearance by microglial cells.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Senescence and autophagy in usual interstitial pneumonia of different etiology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Article
  6. Autophagy and cardiac aging.Cell death and differentiation · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. An overview of macroautophagy in yeast.Journal of molecular biology · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Binding to E1 and E3 is mutually exclusive for the human autophagy E2 Atg3.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Spg5 protein regulates the proteasome in quiescence.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rodney J DevenishDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton campus, Victoria 3800, Australia. Rod.Devenish@monash.edu
Daniel J Klionsky

Funding

ALTERNATIVE VACUOLAR TARGETING MECHANISMS IN YEASTR01GM053396 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KLIONSKY, DANIEL J. · 1995 to 2018
$12.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM053396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is a highly conserved process of quality control occurring inside cells by which cytoplasmic material can be degraded and the products recycled for use as new building blocks or for energy production. The rapid progress and 'explosion' of knowledge concerning autophagic processes in mammals/humans that has occurred over the last 15 years was driven by fundamental studies in yeast, principally using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, leading to the identification and cloning of genes required for autophagy. This chapter reviews the role of yeast studies in understanding the molecular mechanisms of autophagic processes, focusing on aspects that are conserved in mammals/humans and how autophagy is increasingly implicated in the pathogenesis of disease and is required for development and differentiation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutophagyHumansSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID22652877
PMCPMC3615647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.