Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22652453›Full record

ArticleExperimental cell research2012

Insulin receptor substrate 1 expression enhances the sensitivity of 32D cells to chemotherapy-induced cell death.

Holly A Porter, Gregory B Carey, Achsah D Keegan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental cell research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Holly A PorterCenter for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. hport001@umaryland.edu
Gregory B Carey
Achsah D Keegan
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USCenter for Vascular Biology Research · US

Funding

EXPAND PARTICIPATION BY MINORITIES IN BIOMEDICAL SCIENCER25GM055036 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI SUMMERS, MICHAEL FINLEY · 1996 to 2021
$16.9M
Vascular Biology Training ProgramT32HL007698 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Rosemary A Kozar, Dudley K. Strickland · 1991 to 2026
$8.7M
Molecular Mechanisms of IL-4 and IL-13 SignalingR01AI038985 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI KEEGAN, ACHSAH D. · 2001 to 2010
$3.7M
Selective Targeting of MEK and AKt in Lymphoma and Myeloma ApoptosisK22CA128882 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CAREY, GREGORY B · 2007 to 2009
$602k
Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in B Lymphoma FateUH2CA158689 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CAREY, GREGORY B · 2011 to 2012
$355k
Role and Activation Status of IRS1/2 in IL-4-induced Protection from Cell Death.F31CA142165 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI PORTER, HOLLY ALICIA · 2010 to 2010
$32k
NCI NIH HHS 1F31CA142165-01A1NCI NIH HHS F31 CA142165NCI NIH HHS K22 CA128882NCI NIH HHS K22CA128882NCI NIH HHS UH2 CA158689NCI NIH HHS UH2CA158689NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007698NHLBI NIH HHS T32HL007698NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI038985NIAID NIH HHS R01AI038985-12-17NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM055036NIGMS NIH HHS R25-GM55036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adapters IRS1 and IRS2 link growth factor receptors to downstream signaling pathways that regulate proliferation and survival. Both suppress factor-withdrawal-induced apoptosis and have been implicated in cancer progression. However, recent studies suggest IRS1 and IRS2 mediate differential functions in cancer pathogenesis. IRS1 promoted breast cancer proliferation, while IRS2 promoted metastasis. The role of IRS1 and IRS2 in controlling cell responses to chemotherapy is unknown. To determine the role of IRS1 and IRS2 in the sensitivity of cells to chemotherapy, we treated 32D cells lacking or expressing IRS proteins with various concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents. We found that expression of IRS1, in contrast to IRS2, enhanced the sensitivity of 32D cells to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. When IRS2 was expressed with IRS1, the cells no longer showed enhanced sensitivity. Expression of IRS1 did not alter the expression of pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins; however, 32D-IRS1 cells expressed higher levels of Annexin A2. In 32D-IRS1 cells, IRS1 and Annexin A2 were both located in cytoplasmic and membrane fractions. We also found that IRS1 coprecipitated with Annexin A2, while IRS2 did not. Decreasing Annexin A2 levels reduced 32D-IRS1 cell sensitivity to chemotherapy. These results suggest IRS1 enhances sensitivity to chemotherapy in part through Annexin A2.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnnexin A2Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell DeathCells, CulturedDose-Response Relationship, DrugInsulin Receptor Substrate ProteinsMiceStructure-Activity RelationshipAnnexin A2Insulin Receptor Substrate ProteinsIrs1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID22652453
PMCPMC3395425
OpenAlexW2013780430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.