Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22652364›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics2012

In vitro measurement of attenuation and nonlinear scattering from echogenic liposomes.

Shirshendu Paul, Daniel Russakow, Rahul Nahire, Tapas Nandy, Avinash H Ambre, Kalpana Katti, Sanku Mallik, Kausik Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. High-Frequency Array-Based Nanobubble Nonlinear Imaging in a Phantom and In Vivo.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impulse response method for characterization of echogenic liposomes.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Passive imaging with pulsed ultrasound insonations.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shirshendu PaulMechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States.
Daniel Russakow
Rahul Nahire
Tapas Nandy
Avinash H Ambre
Kalpana Katti
Sanku Mallik
Kausik Sarkar

Funding

VOLUMETRIC BREAST DENSITY ESTIMATION USING BREAST SURFACE RECONSTRUCTEDP20RR016472 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI MCLANE, MARY ANN · 2001 to 2011
$37.6M
Lipid Nanoparticle Mediated Inhibition and Detection of Matrix MetalloproteinasesR01CA132034 · NCI · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MALLIK, SANKU · 2008 to 2012
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01 CA 132034NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132034NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016472NCRR NIH HHS P20RR016472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Echogenic liposomes (ELIP) are an excellent candidate for concurrent imaging and drug delivery applications. They combine the advantages of liposomes-biocompatibility and ability to encapsulate both hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs-with strong reflections of ultrasound. The objective of this study is to perform a detailed in vitro acoustic characterization - including nonlinear scattering that has not been studied before - along with an investigation of the primary mechanism of echogenicity. Both components are critical for developing viable clinical applications of ELIP. Mannitol, a cryoprotectant, added during the preparation of ELIP is commonly believed to be critical in making them echogenic. Accordingly, here ELIP prepared with varying amount of mannitol concentration are investigated for their pressure dependent linear and non-linear scattered responses. The average diameter of these liposomes is measured to be 125-185nm. But they have a broad size distribution including liposomes with diameters over a micro-meter as observed by TEM and AFM. These larger liposomes are critical for the overall echogenicity. Attenuation through liposomal solution is measured with four different transducers (central frequencies 2.25, 3.5, 5, 10MHz). Measured attenuation increases linearly with liposome concentration indicating absence of acoustic interactions between liposomes. Due to the broad size distribution, the attenuation shows a flat response without a distinct peak in the range of frequencies (1-12MHz) investigated. A 15-20dB enhancement with 1.67 μg/ml of lipids is observed both for the scattered fundamental and the second harmonic responses at 3.5MHz excitation frequency and 50-800kPa amplitude. It demonstrates the efficacy of ELIP for fundamental as well as harmonic ultrasound imaging. The scattered response however does not show any distinct subharmonic peak for the acoustic excitation parameters studied. Small amount of mannitol proves critical for echogenicity. However, mannitol concentration above 100mM shows no effect.

Indexed as

AcousticsIn Vitro TechniquesLiposomesMannitolMicroscopy, ElectronParticle SizeReproducibility of ResultsSolutionsTransducersLiposomesMannitolSolutions

Identifiers

PMID22652364
PMCPMC3889870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.