Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22652317›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicology2012

Evaluation of multi-well microelectrode arrays for neurotoxicity screening using a chemical training set.

Emma R McConnell, Maxine A McClain, James Ross, William R Lefew, Timothy J Shafer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. mRNA stability and mMolecular cell · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Neuronal SIRT3 Deletion Predisposes to Female-Specific Alterations in Cellular Metabolism, Memory, and Network Excitability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emma R McConnellAxion Biosystems, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Maxine A McClain
James Ross
William R Lefew
Timothy J Shafer
Axion Biosystems (United States) · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

Simultaneous Stimulation and Recording in Scalable Microelectrode ArraysR44NS062477 · NINDS · AXION BIOSYSTEMS, LLC · PI ROSS, JAMES · 2010 to 2015
$3.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R44 NS062477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microelectrode array (MEA) approaches have been proposed as a tool for detecting functional changes in electrically excitable cells, including neurons, exposed to drugs, chemicals or particles. However, conventional single well-MEA systems lack the throughput necessary for screening large numbers of uncharacterized compounds. Recently, multi-well MEA (mwMEA) formats have become available to address the need for increased throughput. The current experiments examined the effects of a training set of 30 chemicals on spontaneous activity in networks of cortical neurons grown on mwMEA plates. Each plate contained 12 wells with 64 microelectrodes/well, for a total of 768 channels. Of the 30 chemicals evaluated, 23 were known to alter neuronal function in vivo ("positives"), including 6 GABAergic and 3 glutamatergic antagonists/agonists, 4 pyrethroids, 3 metals, 2 cholinesterase inhibitors, 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists, valproic acid, verapamil, and fluoxetine. Seven compounds expected to have no effect on neuronal function were tested as "negatives" (glyphosate, acetaminophen, salicylic acid, paraquat, saccharin, d-sorbitol and amoxicillin). Following collection of 33 min of baseline activity, chemical effects (50 μM or highest soluble concentration) were recorded for 33 min. Twenty of the positives altered the mean network spike rate by more than the 14% threshold (two standard deviations from the mean for DMSO control). The three positives without effect were bifenthrin, nicotine and imidacloprid. None of the negative compounds caused a change in activity beyond the threshold. Based on these results, the mwMEA assay has both high sensitivity (87% identification of positive compounds) and specificity (100% identification of negative compounds). These experiments demonstrate the capacity of mwMEAs to screen compounds for neurotoxic effects mediated by a broad variety of mechanisms.

Indexed as

MicroelectrodesAction PotentialsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCells, CulturedCerebral CortexDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalNerve NetNeuronsNeurotransmitter AgentsPoisonsRatsRats, Long-EvansTetrodotoxinToxicity TestsNeurotransmitter AgentsPoisonsTetrodotoxin

Identifiers

PMID22652317
PMCPMC3721981
OpenAlexW2069418036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.