Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22649859›Full record

ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2012

Implementing and evaluating a multicomponent inpatient diabetes management program: putting research into practice.

Miguel Munoz, Peter Pronovost, Joanne Dintzis, Theresa Kemmerer, Nae-Yuh Wang, Yi-Ting Chang, Leigh Efird, Sean M Berenholtz, Sherita Hill Golden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Endocrine Hospitalist: Enhancing the Quality of Diabetes Care.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. EATING AND GLYCEMIC CONTROL AMONG CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS RECEIVING CONTINUOUS INTRAVENOUS INSULIN.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Miguel MunozJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Peter Pronovost
Joanne Dintzis
Theresa Kemmerer
Nae-Yuh Wang
Yi-Ting Chang
Leigh Efird
Sean M Berenholtz
Sherita Hill Golden

Funding

JHU-UMD Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079637 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI AHIMA, REXFORD S. · 2013 to 2017
$9.7M
Diabetes Research and Training CenterP60DK079637 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WONDISFORD, FREDRIC E. · 2008 to 2012
$9.1M
Clinical Research&Epidemiology in Diabetes&EndocrinologyT32DK062707 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TODD T BROWN, Wendy Lynet Bennett · 2002 to 2026
$7.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079637NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK079637NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK062707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrategies for successful implementation of hospitalwide glucose control efforts were addressed in a conceptual model for the development and implementation of an institutional inpatient glucose management program. CONCEPTUAL MODEL COMPONENTS: The Glucose Steering Committee incrementally developed and implemented hospitalwide glucose policies, coupled with targeted education and clinical decision support to facilitate policy acceptance and uptake by staffwhile incorporating process and outcome measures to objectively assess the effectiveness of quality improvement efforts. The model includes four components: (1) engaging staff and hospital executives in the importance of inpatient glycemic management, (2) educating staff involved in the care of patients with diabetes through structured knowledge dissemination, (3) executing evidence-based inpatient glucose management through development of policies and clinical decision aids, and (4) evaluating intervention effectiveness through assessing process measures, intermediary glucometric outcomes, and clinical and economic outcomes. An educational curriculum for nursing, provider, and pharmacist diabetes education programs and current glucometrics were also developed. OUTCOMES: Overall the average patient-day-weighted mean blood glucose (PDWMBG) was below the currently recommended maximum of 180 mg/dL in patients with diabetes and hyperglycemia, with a significant decrease in PDWMBG of 7.8 mg/dL in patients with hyperglycemia. The program resulted in an 18.8% reduction in hypoglycemia event rates, which was sustained.

conclusionInpatient glucose management remains an important area for patient safety, quality improvement, and clinical research, and the implementation model should guide other hospitals in their glucose management initiatives.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementHospital AdministrationBlood GlucoseDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDiabetes MellitusHealth Plan ImplementationHumansInpatientsInservice TrainingPolicyProfessional Staff CommitteesQuality of Health CareBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID22649859
PMCPMC3697928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.