ArticleMinimally invasive surgery2012
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it a plausible alternative to the traditional four-port laparoscopic approach?
Article in Minimally invasive surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- One, two, or three ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?International surgeryTrial
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions.Cureus · 2024Review
- Risk factors for prolonged operative time in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2015Article
- Tripartite comparison of single-incision and conventional laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: A multicenter trial.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015Article
- Hematogenous umbilical metastasis from colon cancer treated by palliative single-incision laparoscopic surgery.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2013Article
- Experiences of single incision cholecystectomy.International journal of medical sciences · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current standard-of-care for treatment of cholecystectomy is the four port laparoscopic approach. The development of single incision/laparoendoscopic single site surgery (SILC/LESS) has now led to the development of new techniques for removal of the gallbladder. The use of SILC/LESS is now currently being evaluated as the next step in treatment of cholecystectomy. This review is an attempt to consolidate the current knowledge and analyze the feasibility of world-wide implementation of SILC/LESS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.