Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22649520›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Assessing the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) in a national sample of Danish youth aged 8-16 years.

Barbara Hoff Esbjørn, Mikael Julius Sømhovd, Clara Turnstedt, Marie Louise Reinholdt-Dunne

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07413887 (The STIME Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07413887 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The STIME Project: Intersectoral Prevention of Severe Youth Mental Health Difficulties

TypeinterventionalSponsorCenter for Clinical Research and PreventionRan2025 to 2028Enrolled1,200ConditionsPreventive Intervention, Mental Health DifficultiesArms'Signs of Disordered Eating', 'Signs of Self-Harm', 'Signs of Internalizing', 'the Parent Pilots', 'Take the Control Back'
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barbara Hoff EsbjørnDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. barbara.hoff@psy.ku.dk
Mikael Julius Sømhovd
Clara Turnstedt
Marie Louise Reinholdt-Dunne

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early identification of anxiety among youth is required to prevent them from going unrecognised and untreated by mental health professionals. A precise identification of the young person's primary difficulty is also required to guide treatment programs. Availability of a valid and easily administrable assessment tool is crucial for identifying youth suffering from anxiety disorders. The purpose of the present study was therefore to examine the psychometric properties of the Danish version of the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS). A total of 667 youth from community schools (4(th) through 9(th) grade) across Denmark participated in the study. The psychometric properties of the RCADS-(DAN) resembled those reported in US and Europe. Within scale reliability was excellent with Chronbach's alpha of.96. All subscales also showed good to excellent internal reliability. The study provides convincing evidence that the RCADS-(DAN) is a valid assessment tool for screening anxiety in Danish youth.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsAnxiety DisordersChildDenmarkDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningModels, StatisticalPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID22649520
PMCPMC3359357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.