Trial reportNeurology2012
Progesterone vs placebo therapy for women with epilepsy: A randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.
- A scoping review of hormonal clinical trials in menstrual cycle-related brain disorders: Studies in premenstrual mood disorder, menstrual migraine, and catamenial epilepsy.Frontiers in neuroendocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Treatments for seizures in catamenial (menstrual-related) epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Neurosteroids and Seizure Activity.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Pooled it
- Allopregnanolone levels and seizure frequency in progesterone-treated women with epilepsy.Neurology · 2014Trial
- Review
- Scientific Symposium: Biological Sex as a Factor in Epilepsy Research and Treatment.Epilepsy currents · 2026Article
- Epilepsy and exercise: a narrative review on the crucial role of neurosteroids in modulating GABAergic neurotransmission.Brain communications · 2026Review
- Metformin as a Neuroendocrine Modulator in Catamenial Epilepsy: Interplay with Sex Hormones and Neurosteroids.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Epilepsy in women of childbearing age: a focused review.Neurological research and practice · 2025Review
- The neuroendocrine puzzle of epilepsy and infertility: what are we missing?Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Research productivity in catamenial epilepsy: A bibliometric analysis of worldwide scientific literature (1956-2022).Heliyon · 2024Review
- Insights into neurosteroids and their role in women with epilepsy.Frontiers in global women's health · 2024Review
- Issues of Women with Epilepsy and Suitable Antiseizure Drugs.Journal of epilepsy research · 2023Review
- Mechanisms linking neurological disorders with reproductive endocrine dysfunction: Insights from epilepsy research.Frontiers in neuroendocrinology · 2023Review
- Article
- Biological rhythms and epilepsy treatment.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Ferulic acid inhibits catamenial epilepsy through modulation of female hormones.Metabolic brain disease · 2022Article
- [Epilepsy with catamenial pattern].Revista de neurologia · 2022Review
- Anticonvulsant Effect of Asparagus racemosus Willd. in a Mouse Model of Catamenial Epilepsy.Neurochemical research · 2022Article
- Neurosteroid replacement therapy for catamenial epilepsy, postpartum depression and neuroendocrine disorders in women.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 13 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess progesterone treatment of intractable seizures in women with partial epilepsy.
methodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III, multicenter, clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of adjunctive cyclic natural progesterone therapy vs placebo treatment of intractable seizures in 294 subjects randomized 2:1 to progesterone or placebo, stratified by catamenial and noncatamenial status. It compared treatments on proportions of ≥50% responders and changes in seizure frequency from 3 baseline to 3 treated menstrual cycles.
resultsThere was no significant difference in proportions of responders between progesterone and placebo in the catamenial and noncatamenial strata. Prespecified secondary analysis showed that the level of perimenstrual seizure exacerbation (C1 level) was a significant predictor of responders for progesterone but not placebo. With increasing C1 levels, responders increased from 21% to 57% with progesterone vs 19% to 20% with placebo. Reductions in seizure frequency correlated with increasing C1 levels for progesterone but not placebo, progressing from 26% to 71% for progesterone vs 25% to 26% for placebo. A prespecified clinically important separation between progesterone and placebo responders (37.8% vs 11.1%; p = 0.037) was realized among 21.4% of women who had C1 level ≥3.
conclusionThere was no difference in the primary outcome of ≥50% responder rates between progesterone vs placebo for catamenial or noncatamenial groups. Post hoc findings suggest that the level of perimenstrual seizure exacerbation is a significant predictor of responder rate with progesterone and that progesterone may provide clinically important benefit for a subset of women with perimenstrually exacerbated seizures. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that cyclic progesterone is ineffective in women with intractable partial epilepsy. Post hoc analysis identified a subset of women with higher levels of perimenstrual seizure exacerbation that were responsive to treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.