Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22649214›Full record

Trial reportNeurology2012

Progesterone vs placebo therapy for women with epilepsy: A randomized clinical trial.

A G Herzog, K M Fowler, S D Smithson, L A Kalayjian, C N Heck, M R Sperling, J D Liporace, C L Harden, B A Dworetzky, P B Pennell and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Treatments for seizures in catamenial (menstrual-related) epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Neurosteroids and Seizure Activity.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Epilepsy in women of childbearing age: a focused review.Neurological research and practice · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Biological rhythms and epilepsy treatment.Frontiers in neurology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. [Epilepsy with catamenial pattern].Revista de neurologia · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 13 institutions in 4 countries.

A G HerzogHarvard Neuroendocrine Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. aherzog@bidmc.harvard.edu
K M Fowler
S D Smithson
L A Kalayjian
C N Heck
M R Sperling
J D Liporace
C L Harden
B A Dworetzky
P B Pennell
J M Massaro
Progesterone Trial Study Group
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHadassah Medical Center · ILDartmouth Hospital · GBEmory Healthcare · USCornell University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CABaim Institute for Clinical Research · USUniversity of Virginia · USAmerican Pharmacists Association · USFord Motor Company (United States) · USUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

PROGESTERONE THERAPY FOR WOMEN WITH EPILEPSYR01NS039466 · NINDS · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI HERZOG, ANDREW G · 2000 to 2008
$10.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS39466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess progesterone treatment of intractable seizures in women with partial epilepsy.

methodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III, multicenter, clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of adjunctive cyclic natural progesterone therapy vs placebo treatment of intractable seizures in 294 subjects randomized 2:1 to progesterone or placebo, stratified by catamenial and noncatamenial status. It compared treatments on proportions of ≥50% responders and changes in seizure frequency from 3 baseline to 3 treated menstrual cycles.

resultsThere was no significant difference in proportions of responders between progesterone and placebo in the catamenial and noncatamenial strata. Prespecified secondary analysis showed that the level of perimenstrual seizure exacerbation (C1 level) was a significant predictor of responders for progesterone but not placebo. With increasing C1 levels, responders increased from 21% to 57% with progesterone vs 19% to 20% with placebo. Reductions in seizure frequency correlated with increasing C1 levels for progesterone but not placebo, progressing from 26% to 71% for progesterone vs 25% to 26% for placebo. A prespecified clinically important separation between progesterone and placebo responders (37.8% vs 11.1%; p = 0.037) was realized among 21.4% of women who had C1 level ≥3.

conclusionThere was no difference in the primary outcome of ≥50% responder rates between progesterone vs placebo for catamenial or noncatamenial groups. Post hoc findings suggest that the level of perimenstrual seizure exacerbation is a significant predictor of responder rate with progesterone and that progesterone may provide clinically important benefit for a subset of women with perimenstrually exacerbated seizures. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that cyclic progesterone is ineffective in women with intractable partial epilepsy. Post hoc analysis identified a subset of women with higher levels of perimenstrual seizure exacerbation that were responsive to treatment.

Indexed as

Menstrual CycleAdolescentAdultAnticonvulsantsDouble-Blind MethodEpilepsyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProgesteroneTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsProgesterone

Identifiers

PMID22649214
PMCPMC3369508
OpenAlexW2112264559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.