ArticleGenetics2012
Comparing enhancer action in cis and in trans.
Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chromatin insulators homie and nhomie can interact with distant copies either together or separately, with distinct outcomes for enhancer-promoter interactions.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Article
- An essential experimental control for functional connectivity mapping with optogenetics.Genetics · 2025Article
- Super-enhancers: drivers of cells' identities and cells' debacles.Epigenomics · 2024Review
- Transvection between nonallelic genomic positions in Drosophila.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Shifting landscapes: the role of 3D genomic organizations in gene regulatory strategies.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2023Review
- Activating and repressing gene expression between chromosomes during stochastic fate specification.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Altering enhancer-promoter linear distance impacts promoter competition in cis and in trans.Genetics · 2022Article
- The 3D genome landscape: Diverse chromosomal interactions and their functional implications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Live imaging and biophysical modeling support a button-based mechanism of somatic homolog pairing ineLife · 2021Article
- Cis-regulatory differences in isoform expression associate with life history strategy variation in Atlantic salmon.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Ordered patterning of the sensory system is susceptible to stochastic features of gene expression.eLife · 2020Article
- Investigating the role of super-enhancer RNAs underlying embryonic stem cell differentiation.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Position Effects Influence Transvection inGenetics · 2019Article
- Characterization of Button Loci that Promote Homologous Chromosome Pairing and Cell-Type-Specific Interchromosomal Gene Regulation.Developmental cell · 2019Article
- Highly structured homolog pairing reflects functional organization of the Drosophila genome.Nature communications · 2019Article
- The Role of Insulators in Transgene Transvection inGenetics · 2019Article
- Two modes of transvection at the eyes absent gene of Drosophila demonstrate plasticity in transcriptional regulatory interactions in cis and in trans.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Visualization of Transvection in Living Drosophila Embryos.Molecular cell · 2018Article
- Dedicated photoreceptor pathways in Drosophila larvae mediate navigation by processing either spatial or temporal cues.Nature communications · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Studies from diverse systems have shown that distinct interchromosomal interactions are a central component of nuclear organization. In some cases, these interactions allow an enhancer to act in trans, modulating the expression of a gene encoded on a separate chromosome held in close proximity. Despite recent advances in uncovering such phenomena, our understanding of how a regulatory element acts on another chromosome remains incomplete. Here, we describe a transgenic approach to better understand enhancer action in trans in Drosophila melanogaster. Using phiC31-based recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE), we placed transgenes carrying combinations of the simple enhancer GMR, a minimal promoter, and different fluorescent reporters at equivalent positions on homologous chromosomes so that they would pair via the endogenous somatic pairing machinery of Drosophila. Our data demonstrate that the enhancer GMR is capable of activating a promoter in trans and does so in a variegated pattern, suggesting stochastic interactions between the enhancer and the promoter when they are carried on separate chromosomes. Furthermore, we quantitatively assessed the impact of two concurrent promoter targets in cis and in trans to GMR, demonstrating that each promoter is capable of competing for the enhancer's activity, with the presence of one negatively affecting expression from the other. Finally, the single-cell resolution afforded by our approach allowed us to show that promoters in cis and in trans to GMR can both be activated in the same nucleus, implying that a single enhancer can share its activity between multiple promoter targets carried on separate chromosomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.