Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22648715›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2012

Dietary polyamine intake and risk of colorectal adenomatous polyps.

Ashley J Vargas, Betsy C Wertheim, Eugene W Gerner, Cynthia A Thomson, Cheryl L Rock, Patricia A Thompson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Colonoscopy practice in lagos, Nigeria: a report of an audit.Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley J VargasDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. ashleyv@e-mail.arizona.edu
Betsy C Wertheim
Eugene W Gerner
Cynthia A Thomson
Cheryl L Rock
Patricia A Thompson
University of California San Diego · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Teri L Bankhead · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
SPORE in Gastrointestinal CancerP50CA095060 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GERNER, EUGENE W · 2002 to 2012
$25.3M
Prevention of APC-Dependent Intestinal CarcinogenesisR01CA123065 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GERNER, EUGENE W · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30CA023074NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095060NCI NIH HHS P50CA95060NCI NIH HHS R01 CA123065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPutrescine, spermidine, and spermine are the polyamines required for human cell growth. The inhibition of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), which is the rate-limiting enzyme of polyamine biosynthesis, decreases tumor growth and the development of colorectal adenomas. A database was developed to estimate dietary polyamine exposure and relate exposure to health outcomes.

objectiveWe hypothesized that high polyamine intake would increase risk of colorectal adenoma and that the allelic variation at ODC G>A +316 would modify the association.

designPolyamine exposure was estimated in subjects pooled (n = 1164) from the control arms of 2 randomized trials for colorectal adenoma prevention [Wheat Bran Fiber low-fiber diet arm (n = 585) and Ursodeoxycholic Acid placebo arm (n = 579)] by using baseline food-frequency questionnaire data. All subjects had to have a diagnosis of colorectal adenoma to be eligible for the trial.

resultsA dietary intake of polyamines above the median amount in the study population was associated with 39% increased risk of colorectal adenoma at follow-up (adjusted OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.83) in the pooled sample. In addition, younger participants (OR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.23, 3.08), women (OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.48, 4.00), and ODC GG genotype carriers (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.53) had significantly increased odds of colorectal adenoma if they consumed above-median polyamine amounts.

conclusionsThis study showed a role for dietary polyamines in colorectal adenoma risk. Corroboration of these findings would confirm a previously unrecognized, modifiable dietary risk factor for colorectal adenoma.

Indexed as

Adenomatous PolypsAge FactorsColorectal NeoplasmsDietFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansIncidenceMaleNutrigenomicsOrnithine DecarboxylasePolyaminesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsSex CharacteristicsOrnithine DecarboxylasePolyamines

Identifiers

PMID22648715
PMCPMC3374737
OpenAlexW2094932797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.