Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22648304›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2012

Stuttering priapism: insights into pathogenesis and management.

Belinda F Morrison, Arthur L Burnett

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. [Priapism: current status and new insights].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Priapism].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Prostate cancer risk after anti-androgen treatment for priapism.International urology and nephrology · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Stuttering priapism in a patient with neurosyphilis.The world journal of men's health · 2013
    Article
  20. Priapism in South West Nigeria-Short and Intermediate-Term Outcomes.Journal of the West African College of Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Belinda F MorrisonDepartment of Surgery, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica.
Arthur L Burnett

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Priapism is defined as a persistent, painful erection that continues beyond, or is unrelated to, sexual stimulation. It may be categorized as either ischemic (low/absent flow) or nonischemic (high flow). Stuttering priapism is a variant of the ischemic type that is characterized by repetitive, transient, painful, self-limiting episodes of priapism. It is associated with various hematological disorders, including sickle cell disease and pharmacological treatments. The consequences of ineffective treatment of priapism are erectile dysfunction and impaired quality of life due to chronic pain and physical disfigurement. Many of the existing medical therapeutic options for treatment of stuttering priapism are nonmechanistic and associated with significant adverse effects. However, the scientific knowledge of stuttering priapism has transitioned in the past few years, from a condition that is poorly understood to one that has borne a burst of evolving molecular science. In this review, the pathophysiology of priapism is discussed, with particular emphasis on new molecular effectors and mechanisms. Novel treatment methods, as well as potential future agents, based on the emerging molecular evidence are discussed.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellErectile DysfunctionHumansIschemiaMalePriapism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.