Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22648120›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2012

Short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric carcinoma: experience at a large-volume center.

Oh Jeong, Seong Yeop Ryu, Xue-Feng Zhao, Mi Ran Jung, Kwang Yong Kim, Young Kyu Park

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2014
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Advances of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oh JeongDepartment of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Chonnam National University College of Medicine, 160, Ilsim-ri, Hwasun-eup, Hwasun-gun, Jeollanam-do, 519-809, South Korea. surgeonjeong@yahoo.co.kr
Seong Yeop Ryu
Xue-Feng Zhao
Mi Ran Jung
Kwang Yong Kim
Young Kyu Park
Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the popularity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) remains a challenging procedure because of its technical difficulties and possible complications. In this study, the authors evaluated the short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of LTG.

methodsThe records of 118 patients who underwent LTG for middle or upper gastric cancer were retrieved from a prospectively constructed database of 1,064 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy between 2007 and 2011. Surgical outcomes of LTG, such as operative results, postoperative courses, morbidities, and mortality, were investigated and compared with those of LDG patients.

resultsOf the 118 LTG patients, one underwent open conversion and three experienced an intraoperative complication. Mean operating time was 292 ± 88 min, and the mean total number of harvested lymph nodes was 41 ± 16. As compared with the LDG group, the LTG group had a significantly longer operation time (292 vs. 220 min, p < 0.001), and significantly more intraoperative blood loss (256 vs. 191 ml, p = 0.002). The overall morbidity rate after LTG was 22.9%, which was significantly higher than after LDG (12.7%, p = 0.002). There were two postoperative mortalities in the LTG group. The most common complications after LTG were anastomosis leakage (n = 9) and luminal bleeding (n = 9), which were followed by anastomosis stricture (n = 4) and abdominal infection (n = 3). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that old age [≥60 years, odds ratio (OR) = 2.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.95-6.84], intraoperative blood loss >200 ml (OR = 3.33, 95% CI = 1.14-9.70), and D2 lymphadenectomy (OR = 3.87, 95% CI = 1.30-11.55) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications after LTG.

conclusionsLTG is a feasible and acceptable procedure for treatment of middle or upper early gastric cancer. Further refinement of anastomosis techniques and considerable experience of laparoscopic gastrectomy are required for proper application of LTG in gastric carcinoma.

Indexed as

FemaleGastrectomyHospitals, High-VolumeHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsStomach NeoplasmsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22648120
OpenAlexW1983197260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.