Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22648009›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research2012

The New York PTSD risk score for assessment of psychological trauma: male and female versions.

Joseph A Boscarino, H Lester Kirchner, Stuart N Hoffman, Jennifer Sartorius, Richard E Adams, Charles R Figley

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The traumatology of life.The Journal of nervous and mental disease · 2012
    Review
  7. Community Disasters, Psychological Trauma, and Crisis Intervention.International journal of emergency mental health
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph A BoscarinoCenter for Health Research, Geisinger Clinic, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA 17822-4400, USA. jaboscarino@geisinger.edu.
H Lester Kirchner
Stuart N Hoffman
Jennifer Sartorius
Richard E Adams
Charles R Figley
Geisinger Medical Center · USKent State University · USTemple University · USTulane University · US

Funding

Mental Health Services in NY after WTC DisasterR01MH066403 · NIMH · NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE · PI BOSCARINO, JOSEPH A · 2002 to 2004
$1.6M
Developing PTSD Risk Assessment Tools Using the World Trade Center Outcome StudyR21MH086317 · NIMH · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI BOSCARINO, JOSEPH A · 2009 to 2010
$437k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066403NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH-66403NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH086317NIMH NIH HHS R21-MH-086317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously developed a new posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) screening instrument-the New York PTSD Risk Score (NYPRS). Since research suggests different PTSD risk factors and outcomes for men and women, in the current study we assessed the suitability of male and female versions of this screening instrument among 3298 adults exposed to traumatic events. Using diagnostic test methods, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and bootstrap techniques, we examined different prediction domains, including core PTSD symptoms, trauma exposures, sleep disturbances, depression symptoms, and other measures to assess PTSD prediction models for men and women. While the original NYPRS worked well in predicting PTSD, significant interaction was detected by gender, suggesting that separate models are warranted for men and women. Model comparisons suggested that while the overall results appeared robust, prediction results differed by gender. For example, for women, core PTSD symptoms contributed more to the prediction score than for men. For men, depression symptoms, sleep disturbance, and trauma exposure contributed more to the prediction score. Men also had higher cut-off scores for PTSD compared to women. There were other gender-specific differences as well. The NYPRS is a screener that appears to be effective in predicting PTSD status among at-risk populations. However, consistent with other medical research, this instrument appears to require male and female versions to be the most effective.

Indexed as

Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesAdultAgedDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRiskRisk AssessmentROC CurveStress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

Identifiers

PMID22648009
PMCPMC3434234
OpenAlexW2071510736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.