Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22647759›Full record

ReviewQJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians2012

Liver fibrosis: a bidirectional model of fibrogenesis and resolution.

P Ramachandran, J P Iredale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Wnt signaling in biliary development, proliferation, and fibrosis.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cellular Mechanisms of Liver Fibrosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Antifibrotic effects of gallic acid on hepatic stellate cells:Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Hepatic Fibrosis in Dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P RamachandranUniversity of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.
J P Iredale

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600033Medical Research Council G0901697Medical Research Council MR/J010766/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is the generic response to chronic injury of varying aetiologies. A number of common mechanisms link this response to the pathogenesis of fibrosis in other organs. While long thought to be relentlessly progressive, there is now excellent evidence in both human liver disease and animal models that hepatic fibrosis is potentially reversible. The liver therefore provides an excellent bidirectional model for the study of fibrogenesis and fibrosis resolution. In this article, we will review the evidence for the reversibility of liver fibrosis. We will highlight some of the mechanisms responsible for fibrogenesis and fibrosis regression, focussing on the role of hepatic myofibroblast activation and apoptosis, the importance of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors and the central involvement of hepatic macrophages in orchestrating this process. Finally, we will briefly discuss what renders liver fibrosis irreversible and how this accumulating knowledge base could lead to badly needed anti-fibrotic therapies in the future.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCytokinesDisease ProgressionHumansLiver CirrhosisMacrophagesMyofibroblastsRemission, SpontaneousTissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1CytokinesTissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1

Identifiers

PMID22647759
PMCPMC3424469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.