Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22647480›Full record

Trial reportTrials2012

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial.

Marcus Ang, Donald Tan, Jodhbir S Mehta

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01216475 (Comparison of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01216475 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparison of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and VisuMax Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (FemtoLASIK): A Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingapore National Eye CentreRan2012 to 2017Enrolled70ConditionsMyopia, Astigmatism, HypermetropiaArmsFemtosecond LASIK, Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Applications of SMILE-extracted lenticules in ophthalmology.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Refractive surgery beyond 2020.Eye (London, England) · 2021
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Quality of life after refractive surgery: ReLEx SMILE vs Femto-LASIK.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcus AngSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Donald Tan
Jodhbir S Mehta
Singapore National Eye Center · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall incision lenticule extraction or SMILE is a novel form of 'flapless' corneal refractive surgery that was adapted from refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx). SMILE uses only one femtosecond laser to complete the refractive surgery, potentially reducing surgical time, side effects, and cost. If successful, SMILE could potentially replace the current, widely practiced laser in-situ keratomileusis or LASIK. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether SMILE is non-inferior to LASIK in terms of refractive outcomes at 3 months post-operatively. METHODS/

designSingle tertiary center, parallel group, single-masked, paired-eye design, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Participants who are eligible for LASIK will be enrolled for study after informed consent. Each participant will be randomized to receive SMILE and LASIK in each eye. Our primary hypothesis (stated as null) in this non-inferiority trial would be that SMILE differs from LASIK in adults (>21 years old) with myopia (> -3.00 diopter (D)) at a tertiary eye center in terms of refractive predictability at 3 months post-operatively. Our secondary hypothesis (stated as null) in this non-inferiority trial would be that SMILE differs from LASIK in adults (>21 years old) with myopia (> -3.00 D) at a tertiary eye center in terms of other refractive outcomes (efficacy, safety, higher-order aberrations) at 3 months post-operatively. Our primary outcome is refractive predictability, which is one of several standard refractive outcomes, defined as the proportion of eyes achieving a postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) within ±0.50 D of the intended target. Randomization will be performed using random allocation sequence generated by a computer with no blocks or restrictions, and implemented by concealing the number-coded surgery within sealed envelopes until just before the procedure. In this single-masked trial, subjects and their caregivers will be masked to the assigned treatment in each eye. DISCUSSION: This novel trial will provide information on whether SMILE has comparable, if not superior, refractive outcomes compared to the established LASIK for myopia, thus providing evidence for translation into clinical practice.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01216475.

Indexed as

Keratomileusis, Laser In SituResearch DesignSurgical FlapsAdultCorneaDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalHumansLasers, ExcimerMyopiaPatient SelectionRefractive Surgical ProceduresSingaporeSingle-Blind MethodTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22647480
PMCPMC3404906
OpenAlexW2171746727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.